Silver byte, I will post another puzzle , you have to find out from where it is.
Magic Combinations From my Games
Sort:
Silver, I post another, it is very familiar but you can not find it in database.
let's see another.
Let's have another.
Let me share a brightest one.
Have you seen it before or do you find it any source? isn't #32 puuzzle amazing ?
It is 36 ply depth.
It is 20 ply depth.
are you making a joke?
ponz111 wrote:
are you making a joke?
why do you think that ?
I don't like that earth64 is getting all this hate. #32 and #36 were very challenging and beautiful puzzles. Ok, let's say these puzzles aren't from his games, wouldn't this still be a nice forum for sharing all these puzzles? Forget the "false" title and have a look for once.
Earth64 wrote:
ponz111 wrote:
are you making a joke?
why do you think that ?
Post #35 analysis:
Rxf7 62.91
Ne5 3.5 (what i would have played followed by c6 assuming c2 was safe)
Rf4 2.38
Its not even the second best move. You stole puzzles and studies and said they were your own games then posted your own games that are full of mistakes. That is why he thinks your joking. Im unfollowing this tread by the way so dont bother responding.
CheckersBeatsChess wrote:
Earth64 wrote:
ponz111 wrote:
are you making a joke?
why do you think that ?
Post #35 analysis:
Rxf7 62.91
Ne5 3.5 (what i would have played followed by c6 assuming c2 was safe)
Rf4 2.38
Its not even the second best move. You stole puzzles and studies and said they were your own games then posted your own games that are full of mistakes. That is why he thinks your joking. Im unfollowing this tread by the way so dont bother responding.
Butthurt much? Hey earth64 the moves in the game may not be best but the end solution is more beautiful. What CheckersBeatsChess doesn't understand is some puzzles are just for entertainment, like some of the daily puzzles. They don't aim primarily to teach people how to win in the most efficient way but at least teach you how to win. I consider CheckersBeatsChess to be a disgrace due to his attitude and excessive seriousness. Chess is not meant to be taken this seriously, and this was a calm discussion before CheckersBeatsChess stirred things up. An efficient victory and a beautiful victory are two different things, but I guess CheckersBeatsChess goes the efficient way. CheckersBeatsChess has no perception of the beautiful way. The same applies to ponz and some others as well. Ponz, for instance, considered the puzzles to be jokes. This is not saying that beauty is superior to efficiency, but it says that beauty in chess isn't something you can toss aside like rubbish. And the same applies to other spectrums of chess too, including efficiency.
Another stolen puzzle. This one is from the match Mitkov-Rosentalis in 1991