Shortest game for position at #260.
The white king is a wild and crazy guy.
Shortest-proof-game challenge
Sort:
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
also whats the point of whites king? rg1 rh1... works
Post the proof game for that method.
Apr 29, 2021
0
#346
well replace the king moves with rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1....
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
well replace the king moves with rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1 rh1 rg1....
Post the proof game for that method.
Apr 30, 2021
0
#348
i was just thinking like instead of the crazy king journey you do
10.rg1 e5 11.rh1 bb4 and bounce the rook around. but the tempi dont work
As the old saying goes, the proof is in the proof game.
Why not give each side another knight and make it a 20 knight position?
It looks legal to me, and is going to take a lot of moves.
Well, it does take a lot of moves, doesn't it.
I noticed a slight improvement at the end, starting after move 83 of my position.
Ilampozhil25 wrote:
i was just thinking like instead of the crazy king journey you do
10.rg1 e5 11.rh1 bb4 and bounce the rook around. but the tempi don't work
I know a White to play and win study where, in order to win, the king has to make seven moves to get back to the starting position with Black to play. But this proof game is the only one I've seen where a king has to make a 13-move trek to lose a move.
ok post the solution i guess