Shortest-proof-game challenge
Sort:
daStrwbrry wrote:
#6667
SPGs in 14.0.
Found out that the previous one is cooked 
; try this simpler version instead
n9531l1 wrote:
daStrwbrry wrote:
#6667
SPGs in 14.0.
Just beat me to it!
b8=Q duals exist too.
Mar 28, 2024
0
#6665
daStrwbrry wrote:
n9531l1 wrote:
daStrwbrry wrote:
#6667
SPGs in 14.0.
Just beat me to it!
b8=Q duals exist too.
Have you tested this with an engine?
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
daStrwbrry wrote:
Just beat me to it!
b8=Q duals exist too.
Have you tested this with an engine?
Just checked it with Jacobi and it does find the unique proof game you posted. The b8=Q proof games were about #6667.
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
I think this is a clever position.
17.5 is my best attempt so far:
Mar 28, 2024
0
#6669
daStrwbrry wrote:
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
I think this is a clever position.
17.5 is my best attempt so far:
Shorter is possible.
BishopTakesH7 wrote:
I think this is a clever position. (#6672)
Unique SPG in 16.5.
daStrwbrry wrote:
#6677
Non-unique SPG in 14.0.
EvinSung wrote:
6660 test
I'm not sure what that means. EvinSung would have given a move count if wanting to have #6660 computer-tested.
n9531l1 wrote:
EvinSung wrote:
6660 test
I'm not sure what that means. EvinSung would have given a move count if wanting to have #6660 computer-tested.
n9531l1 wrote:
EvinSung wrote:
6660 test
I'm not sure what that means. EvinSung would have given a move count if wanting to have #6660 computer-tested.
I'm guessing 45.5 moves is the intention, but if it is, it's cooked.
daStrwbrry wrote:
#6684
Non-unique SPG in 21.0.
Will this work?