13228 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Carlsen will win for sure. It's embarrassing for the World Champion to be so much lower rated than the number one player.
Until recently, Anand was rated above 2800. He is still rated 8th in the world, and it is well known that he is one of the best match players there is.
It's embarrassing that you aren't even over 2100 on a little chess web site.
Was Karpov ever rated #8 while he was champion?
Now I'm curious. When Kasparov finally won the title from Karpov, which was rated higher? Who was rated higher when they first met?
good question. Let's have the answer, data crunchers.
Kasparov was slightly higher rated according to his Modern Chess 2 Book.
But the margin was smaller, some 30 elo pts.
Anand is only 26 points behind Aronian, and he has probably done worse in tournaments due to preparing for the WC.
When Kramnik beat Topalov he was rated much lower than him, but no one said that was embarrasing (Kramnik was rated 2743, while Topalov was 2813, a difference of 70 points). The Anand-Carlsen difference is around 95 points, not that much more when you consider that Carlsen is the highest rated player in history.
Of course, this all must be very embarrasing for Anand. He is obviously just a low rated patzer.
No one thought Kramnik's 2743 was anywhere close to his actual level, since his rating was caused by a year of illness with horrible results. He was 2800 a couple of years before and after the match, while Topalov was in the 2730s to 2760s a couple of years before and after the match.
As for Anand's rating the last years being caused by his saving preparation I have my doubts about that. You may realise that he has dropped somewhat in playing strength as all players do due to age, but that doesn't equal him being a "low rated patzer".
the low rated patzer was a joke :)
I'm sure that Anand has been focusing on prep rather than his recent games, but he is starting to slip with age. His big advantage is his prep and experience, not strength.
Carlsen's jab is too good. It will keep Anand on the outside looking in. It will also keep Anand's combinations from hitting their mark. Carlsen will always win the in fighting, as he does against everyone...
I see Anand winning this match by +1
I find it difficult to find any info about this match. (amount of game etc.) But i think Carlsen will be the strongest after it all.
I like both the players though I am rooting for Anand but all I want to do is enjoy their games.
10.3% chance of Anand winning. I hope he wins though.
Here is the official site: http://chennai2013.fide.com/
Everybody wants to bury Anand. Once upon a time he was everyone's favourite. He is a total gentlemen.... met and played on 3x occassions Simuls, Dinners, etc...
Enormously talented. I read a recent article by Mihail Marin, Schach 11. Objective, not over the top, and thoughtful.
Maybe, he has other priorities,... a wonderful baby son and he has secured his financial future and his name in chess. So maybe this is just another paycheck that he will put away for Baby Anand's future.
He really is a human being and not ONLY a chess player.
And remember everyone buried him after Gelfand beat him last match,...
Kramnik 'thought' he was better,... and got spanked.
Karpov never got over his spanking;
AND he just recently created the modern Rotweli vs. Rubinstein game,... Lodz 1906 against Aronian... Roweli was not even considered a 1st class player at the turn of the 20th century.
Do not 'under-estimate,' him. You can be sure Carlsen does not.
a puncher's yes, but a "kicker's" i do not know brah
2/7/2016 - Quick And Painless
by justrelaxing a few minutes ago
8 queens on 1 board+more chess puzzles
by ButterflyNebula 17 minutes ago
My Refutation To The Fried Liver!
by Joseph_Truelson 20 minutes ago
State of Chess.com Round Two! Post your questions here:
by iMacChess 24 minutes ago
over ranked in a tounament angst!!!
by VassilySlimyslob 24 minutes ago
by Christopher_Parsons 26 minutes ago
PRECISELY at the moment...
by eaguiraud 26 minutes ago
Book or PDF at online
by purnata_2 35 minutes ago
Staunton Chess Set Acquisition Fascinating Knights
by goodknightmike 42 minutes ago
Why is it that the Live Chess Standard category encompasses so many time limits?
by Martin_Stahl 45 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!