13609 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Under USCF rules, can a player with the white pieces insist on using a clock that records the number of moves and automatically adds time after reaching a time control?
In an OTB tournament, my opponent's clock didn't have these abilities. (I knew about this issue before our game because I had overheard parts of a controversy between my opponent and another player in the previous round.) I offered to use my clock instead, but my opponent had the black pieces and wanted to use his clock. I didn't want to cause a problem, and I don't know the rules, so I agreed.
During the game, I needed to move quickly to make the control, but I kept notating so that I would know when we hit 40 moves. Sure enough, I blundered on my 40th move (going from +2 to -2 according to Stockfish), with 6 seconds on my clock. (I also lost several minutes earlier in the game because my time was running during my opponent's turn. He said that his clock sometimes doesn't work if you hit it too hard. I don't remember hitting the clock hard, but I guess I should have been paying closer attention.)
I should have used my time more efficiently, and my opponent did a good job of taking advantage of my mistake. Still, I'd like to know the rules in case I'm ever in a similar situation.
THe USCF website does say the following:
The USCF's rules specify three levels of preference for chess clocks:
When players have questions about what type of clock to use for a game, they should resolve the situation by referring to the three levels of clock preferences.
For example: Two players arrive at the board at the same time.
Player A has a digital clock with time delay feature.
Player B has a mechanical clock. Because Player A's clock is more preferred, he gets to use his clock for the game.
The player of the black pieces has his choice of equally preferred equipment. If both players have a digital clock with time delay feature, Black's choice will prevail.
Now if both of you had digital clocks with "a" time delay, then Black was really in the right about wanting to use HIS clock, unless you could prove that it was defective prior to the game.
Thanks, Shivsky. Is there anything in the rules about what constitutes a defect with the clock and what to do when one player claims that a clock is defective?
As a former USCF club TD, I've pretty much had it easy => Ruling digitals over analogs based on a simple "Does it have time-delay" question as most of the tournaments in my part of the city seldom used classical time controls.
I've never had to deal with that specific 40-moves situation before ... though with regards to defects, I think any player has a right to stop the clock, summon a TD and ask for a clock inspection the minute they feel something's wrong. If the player didn't pay attention to the problem until a costly critical moment that already elapsed, it's really hard to show any give after the fact.
I agree. I never considered complaining after the game started, either to the TD or to my opponent. (I did complain to my wife, and I suppose posting here counts as complaining too.) If I'm ever in a similar situation, I'd wonder whether the complete rules provide any basis for objecting to the TD before the game.
Really nice chess puzzle from old tactic book
by blobby12 a few minutes ago
analysis of an old school chess match
by GalaxKing 4 minutes ago
What would chess solved mean?
by badenwurtca 9 minutes ago
by BlargDragon 17 minutes ago
5/31/2016 - Jonathan Tejeda, Benedito amador Dom Rep 2001
by Ratiti 22 minutes ago
What Would You Do If You Lose Against a Player Lower Rated Than You?
by macer75 40 minutes ago
5/31/2016 - a Classic Technique
by macer75 45 minutes ago
by Amanda2018 45 minutes ago
Stuff Non-Chess Players Say
by akafett 46 minutes ago
by PlayChessPoorly 46 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!