Forums

VaclavHolecek48 vs mattyf9

Sort:
JeeniousChess

mattyf9

1) 3

2) 3

3) 3

4) 3

5) 3

6) 2 (the knight wasnt really threatening anything developing another piece may have been better)

7) 3

8) 3.5(i decided to give it a 3.5 lol just because it was a good square for the knight i thought) 

9) 3 (i didnt think castling was bad but maybe Bd7 developing my 2nd bishop would have been better)

10) 2 (if I had played Bd7 before then i could have played b5 here attacking the bishop and gaining space on the queen side. otherwise maybe Nc5 may was better because now I have doubled pawns on the d file.

11) 3

12) 3

13) 3

14) 3

15) 2 (this move opened up the diagonal for his bishop more pinning the pawn on f7, maybe Rc8 was better.

16) 2 (doesnt accomplish anything. maybe Qc7 is better.

17) 3

18) 1 (this was a blunder. better was Be6

19) 2 (I dont want to trade queens when I'm down in material but my only alternative was Kf6 otherwise the knight was lost. If we exchanged queens then I could move my knight to C5 which is a better square than h5.

20) 3

21) 3

22) 3

23) 3

24) 3

25) 3

26) 3 (i know im giving up another pawn but my bishop was useless in this position)

27) 3

28) 2 (exchanging is not in my best interest. Bd4 is a better square for the bishop and its attacking the rook)

29) 2 (once again exchanging doesn't help me bc im down material

30) 3

31) 3

32) 3

33) 2 (i dont want to exchange but the other variations i played out my position didnt look very good so I thought exchanging was my best option

34) 3

35) 2 ( I should've just taken the pawn the check accomplishes nothing)

36) 3 

37) 3 (even though i regained material and won the game he blundered here so I don't consider this a great move on my part)

38) 3

39) 1.5 (this move was useless I should've just pushed the B pawn to begin with since I have a majority on that side and his king cant catch me.

40) 1.5 (same as above shoulda just pushed the pawn)

41) 3

42) 3

43) 3