19394 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Created on October 13, 2010 |
3302 Votes | 27 Comments
I think it's a very good idea in GM-scale, because winning is much harder than getting a draw ! and I think we'll see many more beautiful games !
This alternative scoring is intended to reduce draws at the highest level. A 3-2-0 system would make losing a bigger deal, so people will play more safely and we'll end up with even more draws.
But that just encourages more draws!
I dislike the 3 - 1 - 0 scoring.
It would make more sence to be 3 - 2 - 0 scoring
Win gets 3
Draw gets 2
loss gets 0
3 - 1 - 0 just makes it to risky
I like it. As Elubas says at the top level it is hard not to draw so a decisive result deserves a greater reward because it is so difficult to achieve.
I'm pretty neutral towards the system.
An interesting alternative might be 5-2-0, still discourages quick draws, but doesn't mess up the points too much because it's still pretty close to 1-1/2-0
I am definitley against it, the main reason being it's too artificial. The truth is chess is now played on such a high level that draws are just very natural results. It's true there are grandmasters draws are there, but can't people just let them go? Does every game have to be a huge fight? Don't let some unexciting games convince you to make a change this drastic.
I think what will happen is someone will get lucky pushing a position as white where they're better, the other white player will just barely allow the other guy to get a draw, and things will just get lopsided. I don't like it.
I voted Other: "Yes, because it really doesn't hurt to try something new." If it doesn't work this time, they can just revert back to 1 - 1/2 - 0 for the tournaments thereafter.
I think many GM's just go in to a tournements, play 13 moves, and then draw. They're just going in and make some cash, but slowly their income will die, without entertaining chess.
I think this is awesome, lets se some chess, not just a opening choise and draws.
it's chess... not soccer... why the heck they want to change it?
the 1 1/2 0 is the best...
I think it's good because it makes the players play better.
after 8 votes:5 for option a
2 for option b
1 for option d
0 for option c which I suppose won't get many votes
I think is a good antidote against most of the GM's draws we see nowadays.
We are always looking for new survey ideas. Please be sure to message Patzer24 with new survey ideas. Thank you!
15 hours ago
4 days ago
10 days ago
3 weeks ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!