13471 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
This is an amazing lecture!! I love endgames and I enjoyed listening to your analysis and topic of discussion about chess style types. I'm definitely a fighter!
Thank you for great instruction
Great video thank for your honesty. It is nice to know that Grandmasters face the same issues as us mere mortals. Interesting topic certainly made me think about my game again many thanks
Was gonna tweet you Danny b/c I knew you'd appreciate this. You've even used "we're not scientists" before. Fighters all the way!
PS self-deprecating alert
if danny doesnt know enough to be a scientist, then i guess im relegated to being a fighter:p
i certainly spend a lot of time trying to look for the best move, and i feel like this gives me the best chance to win. however, i usually find myself down on time and am not able to find those same moves as the game goes on. i usually think that the computer equals truth and therefore the best way to win the game.
so i guess im a scientist type in that im being very analytical, trying to find best move, but i dont have the knowledge to find it often
I think there is a 3rd type of player: that of the "artist". He/she is more concerned with the "beauty/asthetics" of a move or a game and neither with the validity/truth (scientist) or the outcome (fighter).
he faced slender man O.o
The title of the article got me thinking about my chess personality. Also, I got to thinking about what could be gained from determining my opponent's disposition. But the content, while informative, had nothing to do with the title.
I really liked this. I am definitely a fighter, but that's partly because I don't know enough about chess to be considered a "scientist" .
Thank you for video. When he played h4, do you think g5 would have been a good move?
Great game. Interesting topic. Thank you!
very helpful, thank u!!!!
i dont understand what does this game has to do with fighter or scientist...
by GM Gregory Kaidanov
Which one are you? Which one was Karpov? Kasparov? Perhaps most importantly for this video lecture however, is which one is Grandmaster Kaidanov? He reviews a game from his own tournament play, highlighting the different thought processes between a "Scientist" and a "Fighter" along the way. Stick around for the instructive, though error ridden, Rook Endgame. Enjoy!
Players: Ortiz Suarez, I.
vs. Kaidanov, Gregory
English Opening: Symmetrical, Anti-Benoni, Spielmann, Geller Variation (A33)
Related: Part 2 »
Play Key Position Vs. Computer
Diamond Members get unlimited access to the entire Video Lessons Library! Upgrade your account today - you are 100% covered by a no-questions-asked 30 day money-back guarantee!
GM Gregory Kaidanov
Considered one of "the" premier chess trainers in America for more than ten years, Chess.com is very proud to add Grandmaster Gregory Kaidanov to its list of prestigious Video Authors. Arguably one of the strongest GMs never to have won the US Championship, GM Kaidanov's list of accomplishments does however include first place finishes in many other major events, including first place at both the World Open and US Open in 1992. A certified FIDE Senior Trainer, his reputation as a chess coach precedes him internationally. Gregory currently resides in Lexington, Kentucky with his wife Valeria and their three children.
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2016 Chess.com
• Chess - English
Try the new Chess.com!
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!