Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Anand-Carlsen

  • FM krstulov_alex
  • | Nov 11, 2013
  • | 10596 views
  • | 22 comments

On Wcc after round 2 the result is 1-1 by 2 draw. First game is ended after 16 and second after 25 move. Why not play Carlsen for win? I think Carlsen's tactic is win at end, not at start. Or he can't win, because he is not better than Anand? Write your tip here!

Comments


  • 21 months ago

    policarpo

    Carlsen was resilient.

  • 21 months ago

    policarpo

    I think Anand missed a chance to open 1-0. Seemed best material in the game and positional.Game 3

  • 21 months ago

    bolshevikhellraiser

    [COMMENT DELETED]
  • 21 months ago

    smarty715

    Safe play, stare and dare, 11 draws.  Then in game 12 Carlsen goes in for the kill.  Wins it like a walk-off homer in baseball.  (I don't really think this is how it will play out, but it would be dramatic!)  

    Honestly, the question is who will take the first risk?  And will it result in reward?  

  • 21 months ago

    fireballz

    it looks simple

  • 21 months ago

    HydroTherapy1952

    "Softly softly catchee monkey"

    Kipling

  • 21 months ago

    badr2004

    thanks Im no spike english

  • 21 months ago

    FM krstulov_alex

    Because you are is from india. :)

  • 21 months ago

    Sutirtha11

    The more the match progresses anand has a better chance

  • 21 months ago

    Strobs88

    Game 1 or Game 2 were less boring than people are giving them credit for. Anand came out swinging and in both games and was either forced to take draws or concede weaknesses.

  • 21 months ago

    Bershevsky

    I expect brilliance from Carlsen! But so far only boredom for 1st 2 games. Hey just a question. What happens if all games are drawn? Anand retains his title? 

  • 21 months ago

    GarryAlekhine

    anand tries to take a draw not carlsen,because he repeat moves first!

  • 21 months ago

    spikestars

    start baring those fangs and start showing the world what they want to see

  • 21 months ago

    ABS-Russell

    They both already alluded to the reason why they're playing how they are. With the format of 12 games a single loss is very close to losing the entire event. And looking at it from a different perspective - you can't "not win" if you don't lose. It will end up like the Gelfand-Anand match. Boring draws until one players blunders away a game at which point they'll both go insane for different reasons. The player on bottom for obvious reasons, the player on top having to deal with the psychological stress of being ahead. 

  • 21 months ago

    Redman

    I think you are all over-thinking this. Clearly they are just sparring at this stage, they will start to land some blows later in the match. Carlsen needs to make the age advantage count and tire Anand out with long drawn out games. Anand seems to have better preparation but I still favour Calsen to win - just!

  • 21 months ago

    pwnsrppl2

    He has played two unexpected openings, which Anand and his team will now have to work hard to prepare for on short notice. This is a strategic move to increase Anand's workload and eat up resources to work on whatever variations Carlsen has planned next. Anand, meanwhile has tipped his hand that he is prepared to play 1.e4 and 1...d5 positions. Carlsen would have preferred both games were long, gruelling games to tire Anand. But he has scored a psychological blow to Anand. On a side note, it is completely unfair to play WCC match in one player's country, and especially unfare to allow the spectators to applaud their hometown favorite as he moves. They should be ejected immediately.

Back to Top

Post your reply: