Ruy Lopez: Open to Rudeness

Submitted by NM GreenLaser on Thu, 04/17/2008 at 6:38pm.

As the game began, my opponent used the deliberately rude tactic of reading a newspaper during the game. The rudeness was not shown by merely reading during the game. After all, I myself had been a reader during games. However, I always read on the side of the board and only if there were no nearby players. In this case, my opponent was reading holding the paper over the board and the paper was The New York Times, a broadsheet. He was a big guy, but that was not an issue for me. What I was afraid of was letting his ploy affect me. I once drew a game with a master instead of winning because he slammed my clock too hard after a move. The clock was my property and even though I was cool and not angry, the distraction caused an error that allowed him to hold. In this case, all I had to do was to tell my opponent to stop reducing my view of the board, but I was worried he would anger me by his reaction. Another choice instead of or in addition was to get the tournament director, but that required work and could still allow him to provoke me. I remembered a game years earlier when I saw a senior master crushed by a master, perhaps because the senior master was reading Greek philosophy during the game. I also saw that when the newspaper was over the board, I could see the game, while my opponent could not. I decided to secretly laugh at him for trying to psych me out in a way that required him to in effect give me time odds. At the end of this game which was played at a rate of 30 moves in 90 minutes, I had used 58 minutes to my opponent's 97. I have also decided to not give his name, since he may be a decent guy (just as the clock slammer is) after all and naming him would make me appear to hold a grudge or to seek revenge by ridicule.

The opening gave me more cause to laugh. I played the white side of a Ruy Lopez and he played the Open Defense. I had just lectured on the Karpov-Korchnoi World Championship match, in which this variation was featured, at the Bronx Yonkers (now Bob Peretz) Chess Club. I was playing "Karpov," and I was sure not playing against Korchnoi.

I won the game, but the way I handled the psychological problem is not clearly correct. Chess requires intelligence and knowledge, but without character to apply these factors, a player should fail. It would have been easy to be distracted either handling the matter in another way or the way I did handle it. As the Delphic Oracle displayed, "Know thyself." 


» posted in Opening Theory
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Comments:

by NM GreenLaser - 10 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1450

Kolems wrote, "Great game! 34.Nh4 was a quicker death for black."

You are correct. Thanks! I could claim the newspaper must have distracted me, at least during the game, but not when I wrote the article. We all know, or will learn, when we think we have the winning line, we relax and do not always play the best move. The trick then is to not play a bad move.

by Kolems - 10 months ago
Cluainín Uí Ruairc Ireland
Member Since: Dec 2008
Member Points: 71

Great game! 34.Nh4 was a quicker death for black.

by figrock - 12 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jul 2008
Member Points: 1438

Nice game and finish. One lesson to learn here is use your opponents distraction methods against them. Innocent

by masteryoda - 19 months ago
USA United States
Member Since: May 2008
Member Points: 269
Nice job staying focused while your opponent distracted you
by grimreaper1973 - 19 months ago
Albany NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 139
I kinda agree with Marshal Dillon.  I like the sneaky way of getting even.
by NM GreenLaser - 19 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1450

chessis4coolppl wrote, "I'd have called the tournament director."

That is a good move. If you do that without first asking the opponent to stop reading over the board, he could annoy you for not asking him first. If you ask first and he refuses, you have to get up and feel annoyed. Then the director will get him to stop and he will pay attention to the game. He may also decide to be nasty after the director leaves. Then would you ask him to step outside or call the director again? I let him play with his paper and not watch the board. This way I didn't have to do any work or get distracted. I was amused.


by chessis4coolppl - 19 months ago
United States
Member Since: Jun 2007
Member Points: 72
I'd have called the tournament director.
by AntiSniper - 19 months ago
Kaunas Lithuania
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 344
interesting Ruy Lopez opening, i use it, and nice game.
by hptchess - 19 months ago
Warwick United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 262

Good article Lonnie.

 


by NM GreenLaser - 19 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1450

Two of the questions are:

1. Was this a tournament game?

2. At what point did he abandon the newspaper tactic?

Answers:

1. Yes, the tournament is shown above the diagram. The organizer, if my memory works, was Jose Cuchi, who would go on to run the New York Open for about 20 years.

2. For this my memory is not working. I recorded the time the players used, but not this. The question sounds interesting to me now.


by Vegeta2 - 19 months ago
DBZ International
Member Since: Sep 2007
Member Points: 974

Nice game!!!!!!


by Gogetax - 19 months ago
The Shadowlands International
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 684
i wonder was this a tournament game
by JTB - 19 months ago
Bogotá Colombia
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 35
I  asked him for  The New York Times meanwhile he played.
by REVNED - 19 months ago
Cebu City Philippines
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 27

Great! you were able to win the psychological and emotional disturbances. It is not easy to overcome the pressure infact to were able to promote a pawn to Queen and makes you more advantage against your opponent. 


by whistleblower - 19 months ago
Eastbourne Great Britain
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 774
I wonder if he was reading the Chess problem page of the New York Times.
by chopra - 19 months ago
venezuela Venezuela
Member Since: Jul 2007
Member Points: 97
You did well! People like this guy didn't deserve any consideration!
by NM GreenLaser - 19 months ago
Chester, NY United States
Member Since: Oct 2007
Member Points: 1450
One said I am too emotional. Some others would have preferred crude remarks or violence. I had no doubts about my physical capabilities, but had nothing to prove. I dealt with the problem, maybe not in the best way, but I reduced the potential annoyance. Backgammon players limit the stakes by how they handle the doubling cube. I limited the internal response his rudeness could achieve within me. Stopping the gentleman from reading would be like making him pay attention to the game. Doing that would reward him by saving his time and showing him that I made an effort caused by him. That said I did not live to get white hair by taking abuse and I knew what was at stake playing a more personal game. Today, I still have a clean record. I am not banned by any organizers and can hold chess classes in schools and colleges.
by silverchess - 19 months ago
quezon city Philippines
Member Since: Apr 2008
Member Points: 89

Congats for overcoming both the board and the negative attitude.

 


by depthshaman - 19 months ago
United States
Member Since: Nov 2007
Member Points: 280
Yeah, I guess there is some phycology to it, but I grow weary of the "gentle man's" game attitude. He was reading a paper. Tell him to lift it up. If he gives you a rude remark tell him to f--- off. If someone does something that bothers me during a game I tell them to stop. If they snap back I give them trash talk and go in for the kill on the board.
by claudiogoldman - 19 months ago
São Paulo Brazil
Member Since: Mar 2008
Member Points: 7
Really nice ! :-)
« Previous | 1 2 | Next »

Add your comment:

Join Chess.com for free to add your comment! Already a member? Then login now to comment.