I usually do d4, then later g3 to open up both bishops
1.e4 is over-rated

I usually do d4, then later g3 to open up both bishops
Good choice,but I think my f3 move is more effective,because it's more solid

Why not 2.Kf2 ?
You need to control the center with e4,but first of all make a solid pawn with f3

Thats a noobish Opening.. Pls dont post anymore if your Noobish mindingings
:D
Proof that my opening is good:

Lets Play!
Ok,challenge me and I will prove you my opening is good ! You might learn some chess like that...

f3 better than e4, now that is some grade a baloney.
Dont forget that you are also creating weaknesses on your kingside which may become issues.
And you are also wasting a move preparing a move that you can play instantly.
Also your knight is committed to e2. and it dont seem to have any greater active role there.
also blacks d6 just felt like he wasnt even trying to get any counterplay.
Even 2.... - d5 felt like a better try on a quick glance.

f3 better than e4, now that is some grade a baloney.
Dont forget that you are also creating weaknesses on your kingside which may become issues.
And you are also wasting a move preparing a move that you can play instantly.
Also your knight is committed to e2. and it dont seem to have any greater active role there.
also blacks d6 just felt like he wasnt even trying to get any counterplay.
Even 2.... - d5 felt like a better try on a quick glance.
It's not a major weakness in the kingside,especially early in the game,when you can't really attack.
Also the knight on e2 is active enough,you can move it later to d4 or f4 and it supports the d4 push or maybe the f4 push.

f3 is passive and not so good.
1) the dark squares become weak and the e1-h4 and g1-a7 diagonals is also weak.
2) Ng1 cant go to its natural f3 square.
3. It is passive.
4. You spend a tempo and give black the opening advantage of a tempo!
5. look at the stats: http://www.365chess.com/opening.php?m=4&n=405&ms=f3.e5.e4&ns=507.1603.405

Account created <1 week ago...check.
Lame avatar with Mr. Bean reference...check.
Nonsensical username and account info...check.
Overly obvious "bad" idea post with too much trying to justify badness (really? f3 allows white to not castle? you're really reaching)...check.
This is a troll post. Mate in 4.
f3 better than e4, now that is some grade a baloney.
Dont forget that you are also creating weaknesses on your kingside which may become issues.
And you are also wasting a move preparing a move that you can play instantly.
Also your knight is committed to e2. and it dont seem to have any greater active role there.
also blacks d6 just felt like he wasnt even trying to get any counterplay.
Even 2.... - d5 felt like a better try on a quick glance.
It's not a major weakness in the kingside,especially early in the game,when you can't really attack.
Also the knight on e2 is active enough,you can move it later to d4 or f4 and it supports the d4 push or maybe the f4 push.
Yeah, true, the king can be moved later to d4 or f4 and from there it can easily be moved to the dust bin.
After playing hundreds of games of chess,I came to the conclusion that 1.e4 is not the best first move for white.I am not saying it's a bad move,but not a good one either.It opens the diagonal for the bishop and the queen,but:
1)the queen won't come out early because it will be attacked by black pieces and black will lead in development
2)the white-square bishop is useless anyway in most games.The opposite color bishop is much better,as shown in the book "My system" by Aron Nimzowitsch.
Many people say the the e4 pawn is good for controling the center,however it is not defended by any piece and moving central pawns early in the game makes them good targets.
Instead of this mediocre move,I propose a totally different approach to the first white move: