17755 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Hey, so i am an expert level player looking for an aggressive or full of complications line for black against the c3 sicilian. For all this time, i had been playing the following line:
Although it is a risky line, I felt that in my games against lower rated players, the positions got some what dull. Another line i looked at was the Nf6 line:
But i felt again after reading Experts on the anti-sicilians, that the main lines end in many simplifications and even some of the side lines end in dead equal endgames. So my question is: Is there a more dynamic way or improvements for black in the lines above? Thanks
2. ...Nf6 is what I always hated seeing. It is also a transposition to the declined Smith Morra Gambit.
And nevermind what GMs say in books, you won't be playing many GMs anyhow.
Thanks guys! Ok, i'll take a second look at the 2. Nf6 stuff especially if a c3 sicilian player says he hated seeing it
Against the c3 line I usually play the e6 line. 1.e4 c5 2.c3 e6 3.d4 d5. It tis the most solid line against the c3 Sicilian, but it can turn into the French. So I switched to the d5 line. 1.e4 c5 2.c3 d5
I just recently had 2.c3 played against me on ICCF. This guy specialized in what he attributed to GM Tiviakov with 2.c2 Nf6 3.e5 Nd5 4.Bc4, and I noticed this player had been getting some good results. Ultimately, I found a line that buzz-kills Bc4:
Tiviakov at his dvd claims that 2...Qa5 is playable for black.You may want to look closer at this variation.
Depends on where your main strengths lie, but if you really want winning chances at this level, maybe you should look at some sidelines (2...d6+g6, 2...e6, 2...b6).
That's not dead equal.
Yes it is. White has absolutely nothing in that position. A check with Houdini shows 0.00 no matter how long you let it think.
Tbh, i think you look at the engine evaluation a bit too much. Of course its a draw, but humanistically speaking, if white is the only one to win this position, that in my mind gives white the advantage.
Merely suggesting the engine evaluation shows 0.00 in a position with:
A. Material perfectly balanced.
B. Pawns on the same files.
C. Queens off the board.
Does NOT equal "you look at the engine evaluation a bit too much." Rather, it's backing up the facts above. I half expected someone to pull that crap, so I was just waiting for the reply to happen. White has NO more right to expect to win this than black does.
Is opening theory essential?
by DavidIreland3141 a few minutes ago
I got ground down and not sure why!
by DavidIreland3141 7 minutes ago
Giuoco Pianissimo or Anderssen Ruy Lopez?
by Fixing_A_Hole 9 minutes ago
11/27/2015 - Holes and Fillings
by tanmay_chakrabarti 10 minutes ago
by baddogno 11 minutes ago
QGA retaining the pawn
by TwoMove 11 minutes ago
Caro-Kann Study Group (1.e4 c6)
by X_PLAYER_J_X 12 minutes ago
by Martin_Stahl 12 minutes ago
just a newbie
by neverherebefore 13 minutes ago
What is the most aggressive opening against d4?
by X_PLAYER_J_X 14 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!