11637 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Here is another game with a similar variation. No doubt all of these variations give Black equality but white virtually always is the one attacking/with the initiative and few players (particularly Nimzo-Indian players) can honestly say they enjoy defending.
And anyway, no one can fault Rudels suggestions then?
Quoting games were significantly higher rated players won doesn't prove any opening advantage. The fact that Yusupov plays it quite a bit, at least against e6 lines, shows it is a reasonable opening. Black can avoid d4xc5 with early b6, if bothered by it.
This shows technique of finding games to support own point of view. In game showed were Yusupov won, he was on the way to being rated third highest player in world. In game I showed more of a trainer playing a slightly higher rated player.
In position were 10...c5xd4 played think it is better if white had played a3, instead of f4. Not sure if you are bothered by dispruting nb4 though. Eingorn thinks 12...Ne4 instead of Rc8 is very nice for black. In general don't think black has much to fear in this setup. Has played classical moves and peices are on active locations.
Is Rubinstein system playing d4xc5 when applicable or something else?, am not very sure myself.
Nimzoindian players will not care about any of these examples, since they will not play an early ...d5.
Yusupov must have got his theory mixed up .. I think 9. f4 is quite weird, in most games white tries to complete his development before starting a kingside attack. 9. Bb2 is far less commital, followed by a3.
Also with the Rubinstein Attack (I think, I might not be correct) that white does not immediately play Ne5-f4-Rf3 etc, instead playing in the centre or on the queenside but with a Zukertort-type structure
Here is a game of Rubinstein himself playing his system
Hi Markus. I think I can help you if you're still interested. Been studying this for about a year. And my rating is approximately 2000. What's yours?
On Rudel not knowing chess it's his raw chess understanding. Take for example one of his comments:
'I have taken ' , or 'I think' to this effect then quoting that anyone over 2000 is the goal to reach when studying what to do in this opening. When the real goal is 2400+. Then there is no positional analysis. It's only explaining the research how a player of his level understands it. (last I heard he was 1500-1700)
Probably the best way to study this is to decide to play everything that is classical and sound. Follow Artur Jusupov as an example. You transpose to the zukertort. And main lines should feature pushing e4 or c4 when necessary.
Reason I say this is because most people who take this up do it because they want an easy system that they can avoid things. And that is kind of bad. You need to have certain ideas that come from certain openings to progress. So here is why Rudel's book is good. It has a decent suggestion for dealing with early B excursions. And the Phoenix attack is a good alternative but his explanation is lacking. It has a good base but you have to study why..
My suggestion would be to pick up Bogdanovich's book and use Rudel's book as a supplement. For the side lines. My experience shows his research against the Bf5 and Bg4 are sound at least. And the Phoenix attack is fine, just another development. Bogdanovich is an IM and can explain the positional ideas necessary to play at a higher level. The only down side is he only discusses pure zukertort so transpositions are necessary. That could be where Rudel is decent.
If you're interested maybe we can meet and collaborate?
12/27/2014 - Levenfish-Ryumin, Moscow 1936
by mohandisusa a few minutes ago
by eastyz 5 minutes ago
12/1/2014 - Mate in 4
by agnivo 5 minutes ago
Game I lost against Daniel Nordquelle
by vegma 8 minutes ago
If You Could Fix One Thing On Chess.com, What Would It Be?
by leiph15 19 minutes ago
The Backyard Professor
by mosai 21 minutes ago
by Raymaster2500 28 minutes ago
Why do you like playing chess?
by CrazyJae 29 minutes ago
Why is the most powerful, versatile and indispensable chess piece a woman?
by CrazyJae 33 minutes ago
a picture of a broken chess player
by CrazyJae 38 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!