10904 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
some gambits are bad i will admit. Not the sound ones. I myself dont like the KG myself, but its perfectly sound. I am going to make a video soon on gambits.
But that aside, its a sound attack if you are playing someone with no defensive skills, an amatuer. Like I said before, this is great for beating amatuers and blitz (the other guy, whatupyodog, got his rating so high in blitz) but if defended accurately by one who knows what he is doing (who you are not likely to face if you stay at this level) then the attack is not sound. You don't take out a couple of pieces and throw them at the king hoping for a make. You methodically develop your pieces, make threats, attack when its time to attack, use the tactics you are given to you, ect. And being down development is underestimated by you. You hand black the advantage that white starts with. As I've said, its more important in the higher levels, so if you instend to casually play chess and drift along at the same level your whole life, then by all means play the parham
a sample line
What the hell Christiansoldier. After d6, white plays h3, and you don't kingside castle in the Parham. You queenside so you can move both rooks over and rape white because he has to mess up his kingside to stop the bishop from pinning his knight.
A. Enough with the language
B. You are only better in blitz. I challenge you to an unrated online game. You play your parham and I'll defend.
C. I do not fall for the parham. I admit when I was a little kid I played it and fell for it, but not anymore. And thats because you play weaker players. The average rating of who you play is 200 points below your actual rating.
D. If you dont delete your previous post, I will report you, as this is a family site
This shows that I dont have to castle kingside myself, but I still dont think your attack has much substance. However its too far to analyze.
Ok I'm done talking to you. You have no clue what you are talking about, it's just not worth wasting my time on this.
lol ok then I'm done trying to get you to improve Gavinator. I've been trying to help you this whole time, not throw rocks and insult you like all these other guys. But if you dont want it thats ok. Its good for your level as I said. Just please stop posting about it in the forums in that case though please
My level is above you bro. You aren't even above 1300, and you've played hundreds of games on this site. I've played like 10, and I don't even try (because I watch seinfeld the whole time), and I'm still higher than you. I know you like to think book knowledge makes you good, it really doesn't, just worry about your own improvement mister IM.
I do not want to debate our strength
Its good for your level as I said
That implies you think you're better than me. I am higher rated, and have only played a few games :P
A simple little line Houdini gave me. Did white make any horrid blunders this time?
ummm Qd1... why not just do something sensible like bb3?
I finaly realized the parham gives great attacking chances with no risk.
Thank you jetfighter.
I never said that. Quit misquoting an shoving words in my mouth, eric ... oh wait, that might get me banned. Crap I hate politics
5...Nf6 and the Queen is awkwardly placed
my general rule is if "Your not threatening mate and there is a night on c6, play Ne2". So this is irrelevant, just stop posting boards.
watch your language
never said that either, I have never use that word on this site.
Please, everyone, let's leave the swearing off Chess.com. It's fine to have a debate, but there is no need for horrible language. If it continues, I'll have no choice but to lock or delete the thread. :)
Thanks for your understanding, guys.
please do the later of the two
What's up with all the screaming aggressive women on FOX NEWS?
by johnmusacha a few minutes ago
Vishy Anand claims to be able to see 70 moves ahead...
by SmyslovFan 3 minutes ago
Keep Your Queen Carefully
by Borneo_Chess 4 minutes ago
What do you feel about players that do perpetual checks when they are losing?
by BlackLeopard-1 4 minutes ago
Have you ever been imitated by a Chess.com member?
by Jimmykay 7 minutes ago
Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?
by ponz111 8 minutes ago
by chessmicky 11 minutes ago
Hou Yifan preparing to replace Judit Polgar as Women's #1?
by trysts 18 minutes ago
7/23/2014 - Kasparov - Vilaisarn (simul) 2008
by resa1234 20 minutes ago
I need your Help Australians!
by Davenik 22 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!