13742 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I have think a lot if the London System is the right opening for me and the answer is: "No"!
Why? Because I have better results with the Spanish enxchange variation. I have started every game in my season with d4 (Queens Gambit). I do not know if d4 or e4 is right or better for me. So I play Queens Gambit and Ruy Lopez (exchange variation). I must say that I feel better in positions, where the board is not full with pieces and pawns. So closed games like Indian Defense and QG are not the best opening for me. But I have good results with QG, too.
Blackmar Diemer Gambit for example is an opening which I like because I love it when someone sacrifices material for initiative and assault.
I am studying the book "The amateur´s mind" by Jeremy Silman. Ther I have learn a lot about positional play therby I know how to play in closed games.
Yes I know I should not focus on openings but I have to make a repertoire. So the exchange Variation in the Ruy Lopez is my fave opening (1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 a6 4. Bxc6 dxc6). Should I play the QG, the Ruy Lopez or the Blackmar Diemer Gambit? I am overwhelmed! Can anybody help me?
When I learned chess just six years ago I always played 1.e4, the Italian game, and the scotch game and maybe gambit's. I just played very tactical and sharp chess like I do (most times) today. It's tactics that make you a good chess player. Not a load of that in the London system. I'm not saying the London system is bad, you get your pieces out but you are not going to go for a attack in move 5 you see? But that's just how I play chess. And I am getting better and better and better. Tactical play rules!
I know less about the London System than I know about nuclear physics. Nevertheless, I took a look at it, and found this interesting, and rather recent game by Fabiano. I tried it in a bunch of blitz games when the opportunity arose, and mostly got killed. But not always......
In this funny blitz game, it's a case of who can save their knight out-on-limb and who can't.......
Exploiting a lead in development?
by Mal_Smith 6 minutes ago
5/24/2015 - Too Many Threats, Not Enough Solutions
by Budster2022 7 minutes ago
by kenardi 12 minutes ago
So I've beated the so called Impossible bot ...
by EliranCohen1991 13 minutes ago
What to do/think when opponent is thinking?
by CoolRandomStar 17 minutes ago
Find the best move
by VibrantMoves 43 minutes ago
Reproduction and Real Jaques of London Chess Set
by aristotele1 80 minutes ago
one move chess could do without
by Alessandro170 83 minutes ago
The two most f'd up situations
by Fiveofswords 90 minutes ago
en passant = Cheater!
by Pulpofeira 95 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!