17920 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The point of openings like the Ponz or the King's Gambit is that you don't play them repeatedly against players who see you coming.
Spassky played many games against Fischer, but he only played the King's Gambit once and he won.
I read what you wrote. I'm not talking about someone using the opening occasionally or about someone who only plays OTB tournaments occasionally. I'm talking about players who use the Ponziani as their main repertoire weapon against players who have an incentive to come prepared.
Perhaps I'm not the one reading carefully?
Ipcress, it is you who is not reading what others are writing. Ponz argues that you can play his opening for the rest of your life.
I'm talking about players who use the Ponziani as their main repertoire weapon against players who have an incentive to come prepared.
SF: And I keep repeating that's not the Ponziani scenario I'm talking about.
You are not reading me carefully. Period.
I agree with ponz111 about some things but not all things. However, I am not ponz111 .
Or, maybe I'm addressing the topic rather than how you play it.
Well, if you are rated under say 2450. In my next life I will open 1. c4 with the Ponziani as a second opening.
There is a whole lot of new theory on the Ponziani.
However, chess is getting played out and there are drawish lines vs most openings. Winning lines vs the bad openings.
SmyslovFan: Nonetheless you keep addressing me.
I must conclude you are either careless or dishonest.
My point is that mostly Black will not have studied the Ponz and will end up with a position deficit, material deficit or a time deficit or some combination of those.
You start off by quoting me in several posts (#278 for example), then you make the statement above. You don't say that you play the Ponziani only occasionally, you use the generic terms "White" and "Black"
I have said repeatedly that I think the Ponziani is fine as an unusual or offbeat opening.
And yet you continue to attack me personally.
You are responsible for your own conclusions. You have tried to make this personal. I have tried to discuss the opening as a general repertoire choice.
How big is Magnus Carlsen's ego?
by Robert0905 a few minutes ago
Improve Quality of Blitz Chess
by Murgen 4 minutes ago
Is 3D chess like Spock played on Star Trek any good?
by Avexron 8 minutes ago
4/19/2015 - Mate in 3
by latoch 9 minutes ago
Why can't you promote a pawn to king?
by Avexron 9 minutes ago
computer vs computer
by tigerprowl9 10 minutes ago
4/18/2015 - Tactics In The Distance
by BryanCFB 11 minutes ago
Are chess position images free to use
by tigerprowl9 17 minutes ago
Gashimov Memorial 2015
by tigerprowl9 23 minutes ago
My Best Games
by Popeye_Sailorman 24 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!