Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Ponziani: Impractical in non-computer Correspondence Chess?


  • 2 months ago · Quote · #301

    SmyslovFan

    I read what you wrote. I'm not talking about someone using the opening occasionally or about someone who only plays OTB tournaments occasionally. I'm talking about players who use the Ponziani as their main repertoire weapon against players who have an incentive to come prepared.

    Perhaps I'm not the one reading carefully?

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #302

    SmyslovFan

    Ipcress, it is you who is not reading what others are writing. Ponz argues that you can play his opening for the rest of your life.

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #303

    ipcress12

    I'm talking about players who use the Ponziani as their main repertoire weapon against players who have an incentive to come prepared.

    SF: And I keep repeating that's not the Ponziani scenario I'm talking about.

    You are not reading me carefully. Period.

    I agree with ponz111 about some things but not all things. However, I am not ponz111 .

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #304

    SmyslovFan

    Or, maybe I'm addressing the topic rather than how you play it.

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #305

    ponz111

    Well, if you are rated under say 2450.  In my next life I will open 1. c4 with the Ponziani as a second opening.

    There is a whole lot of new theory on the Ponziani.

    However, chess is getting played out and there are drawish lines vs most openings.  Winning lines vs the bad openings.

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #306

    ipcress12

    Or, maybe I'm addressing the topic rather than how you play it.

    SmyslovFan: Nonetheless you keep addressing me.

    I must conclude you are either careless or dishonest.

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #307

    SmyslovFan

    ipcress12 wrote:

     

    My point is that mostly Black will not have studied the Ponz and will end up with a position deficit, material deficit or a time deficit or some combination of those.

    You start off by quoting me in several posts (#278 for example), then you make the statement above. You don't say that you play the Ponziani only occasionally, you use the generic terms "White" and "Black"

    I have said repeatedly that I think the Ponziani is fine as an unusual or offbeat opening. 

    And yet you continue to attack me personally. 

  • 2 months ago · Quote · #308

    SmyslovFan

    ipcress12 wrote:

    Or, maybe I'm addressing the topic rather than how you play it.

    SmyslovFan: Nonetheless you keep addressing me.

    I must conclude you are either careless or dishonest.

    You are responsible for your own conclusions. You have tried to make this personal. I have tried to discuss the opening as a general repertoire choice.


Back to Top

Post your reply: