10485 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Shouldn't it be "invinted?"
hey whenever my opponent plays Qh4!? i play the novelty Nxh4!!...........
very difficult to find unless u memorises this opening stuff....
I guess you didn't understand the point of the opening. Qh4 is the novelty.
This squabbling is unbecoming of chess pioneers like ourselves.
Freaking hilarious. I have never laughed this hard
Then I guess you've never seen my "invinted a new opening" thread?
I love the haha opening game, Mark. Great forum fun people!
The "invinted" series is pretty funny too.
I can't believe the number of goofballs that think any 3 random moves is a "system" or that a trap invented in 1490 should be named after them.
Actually this opening was invented by Siddhartha, an Indian GM,
back in 540 BCE. It was formally called the Buddha Gambit and he became enlightened after winning the game. This gambit was lost for close to 2553 years until the UnMaster became enlightned too. Siddhartha was rated 2903 but it is lost to history.
Master Po is very wise
In order for white to get an advantage in that line, white must decline the queen sacrifice and obtain the opposition with 4.Ke2!!
How come you did not use this opening in our game
1.e4 e5 2.Nf3 Nf6 3.Bd3 is actually interesting. If black plays Nc6 then c3 will have white get his Ruy Lopez bishop to c2 with several tempi gained. 3...d5 could be a problem for white though. 4.exd5 Nxd5?! 5.Nxe5 Qe7 6.0-0 or 5...Nf4 6.0-0 so black can play 4...Qxd5?! 5.Nc3 followed by 0-0. Looks interesting. 4...e4! seems to kill white's plans though. Too bad. And after 3...d5 4.Nxe5, the bishop on d3 is misplaced. You know, there is a reason why this move (3.Bd3) is never played as a refutation of the Petroff, because it proves the Petroff's strength.
Rate the avatar above - II ( The return)
by ajttja a few minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by batgirl 2 minutes ago
Who can beat Carlsen?
by achja 6 minutes ago
why does magnus go to the lavatory so often during his games?
by RonaldJosephCote 6 minutes ago
by Itude 7 minutes ago
How can you be a moderator for free ?
by kco 8 minutes ago
SebLeb bullet brawl ( New video )
by SebLeb0210 8 minutes ago
3/7/2014 - Mate in 4
by luguzar 13 minutes ago
How to report someone?
by RonaldJosephCote 15 minutes ago
King and pawn vs king and pawn on same file
by Am_I_Not_Merciful 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!