I hate playing black against 1. d4, always the c8 bishop ends up being bad. Either it is stuck behind away from the action, or when I try to develop the c8 bishop then I get killed on the b7 square.
I am still looking for a good system to play against 1. d4, any suggestions? 
I hate playing black against 1. d4, always the c8 bishop ends up being bad. Either it is stuck behind away from the action, or when I try to develop the c8 bishop then I get killed on the b7 square.
I am still looking for a good system to play against 1. d4, any suggestions?
What do you think about Volgesky Gambit in Benony:
1. d4 Nf6 2. c4 c5 3. d5 b5 4. cxb5 a6
You have a sharp game and there are no problems with the Bishop on c8.
The Slav and Semi-Slav as Black. It seems like White gets too much attack for that pawn, and Black only hangs on by a thread. I've been much happier since I switched to the Nimzo-Indian and Queen's Indian defenses.
How do you think ??
I hate playing black against 1. d4, always the c8 bishop ends up being bad. Either it is stuck behind away from the action, or when I try to develop the c8 bishop then I get killed on the b7 square.
I am still looking for a good system to play against 1. d4, any suggestions?
Ironically, a friend and I the other day were talking about this very subject. That light-squared bishop can really be a nuisance at times. It kills me in the Dutch Leningrad, and I can't wait to trade that thing off at the first opportunity in the Benoni.
Maybe you should try the Nimzo? (I like to fianchetto that bishop whenever possible in that line.)
Why do you find this weird?
I love all openings =D
I sometimes play poorly against openings I don't know, panicking instead of trying to play for basic development.
I think a combined repetoire of Bog/ Nimzo-Indian as sugguested by Roman Dzin,Lev Alburt, and Eugene Pereishteyn.All my piece get play. I've tried many others until I settled on this plan. Matt try it.
I hear you because 1 d4 without 2 c4 usually leads to a dull, boring game (assuming 3 c4 isn't played). If your reply is 1 d4 Nf6, then you might want to give 2 ... c5 a try. It immediately opens up your queenside and puts pressure on the d4-square.)
1.a3?! avoids opening theory, doesn't create any serious weaknesses, and may lead to your opponents underestimating you. Svidler, Leko, Morozevich, Chigorin, Anderssen, and Mieses all used it against unsuspecting opponents.
1.a3?! avoids opening theory, doesn't create any serious weaknesses, and may lead to your opponents underestimating you. Svidler, Leko, Morozevich, Chigorin, Anderssen, and Mieses all used it against unsuspecting opponents.
That reminds me of the time Tony Miles played 1 ... a6!? against Karpov..........and WON. Karpov was really ticked after that one.
Which openings give you the most trouble?
For me, the French is very difficult to play against, even more so than the Sicilian. As Black, the Taimanov (or Flick-Knife) Variation of the Benoni has forced me to give up playing 1 d4 Nf6 2 c4 c5. I now only play the Benoni after White has played Nf3, which blocks the dreaded f-pawn.