Bobby fischer also complained about opening theory.
Why don't GM's play the King's Gambit in long games?
Sort:
Dear Chessfriend,
Due to this coronavirus situation, I lowered my prices. Instead of 30 EUR or 35 USD /hour, my new pupils get a discount, so the new prices are 25 EUR or 30 USD/hour. 
Don't hesitate to send me a message.
My name is Gabor Balazs. I am a Hungarian FM, fighting for the IM title. My top ELO is 2435. I have been playing chess for 21 years. I won the Hungarian Rapid Championship twice (U16 and U18).
I love teaching chess and it is very important for me that both of us enjoy the lessons beside the hard work. I have pupils almost all the levels from beginners to advanced players (1100-2200 ELO).
Why should you choose me?
- I have a widespread opening repertoire (a lot of openings are analysed by strong Grand Masters).
- I have a lot of chess books in PDF and Chessbase format, so I can teach you the main middlegame plans, the art of calculations, famous chess games and the endgame theory.
- I have elaborated, personalized training plans, which help you to improve your skills effectively.
- I help you analyse your games deeply, so you can realise your mistakes and learn from them.
- I am really flexible and hard-working person, the quality of my work is really important for me.
Please, contact me (balazsgabor1991@gmail.com), if you are interested in working with me, I am looking forward to your message.
The King's Gambit has been more or less refuted.
komodochess13 wrote:
The King's Gambit has been more or less refuted.
Please note the date of this article:
https://en.chessbase.com/post/rajlich-busting-the-king-s-gambit-this-time-for-sure
If the KG has been "refuted", rather than just write a verbal statement (opinion), perhaps submitting proof would be more effective- so, how about using two computers and have them play the KG against each other, it could be Stockfish vs Hiarcs, or any two strong engines at high level and whatever time control its to be set at.
Most people have access to two engines, via pc, laptop, Ipad, cellphone.... And its not like its alot of work to setup the position, all it takes it a mere two moves: e4 e5 f4.
Let the two engines play a series of games, each one playing both sides, and if someone here can show that white lost every game to black, THEN, I am inclined to believe the KG has been refuted !
"I can tell you, you spend a lot of time analyzing it and it always ends up with negative results"
I suspect the reason that titled players do not play the King's Gambit on a regular basis in long games has less to do with the opening and more to do with the players themselves.
After all we are talking about titled players who not only have a total different perspective to and on the game but also treat the game as a source of income (in part or wholly).
That being said why on earth would you play an opening (in an event that offers money, a norm and prestige) that at their level offers little or no advantage when they are other opening methods that do.
I am sure there are titled players who play all sorts opening bollicks just to take their opponents out of book into uncharted waters just to throw them off but first, that would be the exception rather than the rule and two, it would be an all together very risky strategy given the potential high ratings of one's opponent and the time they would have to be able to think their way through any opening complications.
HTH
I find it hard to choose between the left and the right opening bollick.
Bollick?
The kingside or queenside bollick if you prefer.
What.
Talking bollicks mate.
Google doesn’t think it’s a word lol
bollicks has a red line of doom
Oh good lord
Going back to the facts for a moment: the original post is correct, top players (rated +2725) do not play the King's Gambit as White in long time control games very often. They do play it fairly often in fast time control games.
It is considered very risky for both sides which also means white
Probably bc the kings gambit is fricking garbage
Most lines of the King's Gambit have winning % for black that is nearly as high as for white--there are fewer draws. GMs are playing for $$ and would rather have a somewhat lesser chance at a full point but a much greater possibility of scoring at least 1/2 point. The higher the point total at the end of the tournament, the more money and elo points earned. The King's Gambit might be okay for situations when a win is a must, but won't be a regular choice for a professional player.
Bobby Fischer played the King's Gambit against Larry Evans.