Ratings

Sort:
Nytik

And therefore, they have higher ratings... Statistically, these ratings are fairly accurate.

mattattack99

I have taken a million rating tests online, every time they say I have a rating between 1500 and 1800. I'm 1377.

Nytik
mattattack99 wrote:

I have taken a million rating tests online, every time they say I have a rating between 1500 and 1800. I'm 1377.


Different rating pools. Those tests were not designed for this site.

GMoney5097

That's what makes the Glicko system so great.  It takes into account the accuracy of your enemy's rating, so if you lose to a 1200 (but an internal 2200), you won't lose as many points as you would to a 1200 who's played over 9000 games.

(Just for the record, Nytik, this isn't your thread.  Tongue out)

Nytik
G-Money7 wrote:

(Just for the record, Nytik, this isn't your thread.  )


I know, but I enjoy sharing my wealth of knowledge. Please, stop me if I'm being irritating. Wink

GMoney5097
Nytik wrote:
G-Money7 wrote:

(Just for the record, Nytik, this isn't your thread.  )


I know, but I enjoy sharing my wealth of knowledge. Please, stop me if I'm being irritating. 


 You completely missed the ball on this one, Nytik.  Maybe you should go back and reread my post.  Surprised

My comment had absolutely nothing to do with you posting here.  (Keep on doing it, you're a great contributer to the chess.com community!!)

Nytik
G-Money7 wrote:
Nytik wrote:
G-Money7 wrote:

(Just for the record, Nytik, this isn't your thread.  )


I know, but I enjoy sharing my wealth of knowledge. Please, stop me if I'm being irritating. 


 You completely missed the ball on this one, Nytik.  Maybe you should go back and reread my post.


Just going through old threads I've posted in, and came across this...

You know, I never did figure out what you meant in that post. Perhaps the mystery shall remain so for all of time.

The irony is, now this is my thread. Wink