Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Chess 960 Live chess?

  • 4 months ago · Quote · #121


    ArtNJ написал:

     Perhaps its the lowest of low priorities, but it really seems like a dead issue.  

    Это непонятно . Если онлайн 960 шахматы появились давно одновременно с классическими , то почему нет продолжения в виде живых шахмат 960 ??

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #122


    I want to express that I too am waiting for 960 in Live. I'm very curious to see how my rating will be considering I've never studied openings in standard chess. Who has the time!?!?

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #123


    Is Lichess.org the best place to play 960 live?  I'm having trouble getting FICS working at the moment, but my recollection is that 960 wasnt that active on FICS.  I can get a game in a minute or two on Lichess, so its working ok for me at the moment.  

  • 3 months ago · Quote · #124


    Lichess is great, so is Chesscube. There are others as well. Chesscube has the longest Chess960 history. Not sure if the ICC (internet chess club) supports live 960. It baffles me that Chess.com still hasn't implemented it. Just amazing. Been trying for four years now!

  • 8 weeks ago · Quote · #125



  • 7 weeks ago · Quote · #126


    Please implement this soon. It’s been 5 years! Recently I got into Chess960 and I have been playing it semi-live using the turn-based system and it was somewhat inconvenient. Mostly it is me using my iPhone as a move-notification system.

  • 7 weeks ago · Quote · #127


    lichess.org has it now and it works just fine.  Lichess is the best chess site in some ways.  Player base is 1/5th of here though.  

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #128


    I would like to play chess 960 here.

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #129


    I would like a billion dollars and a harem.  People need to be realistic.  Chess.com has proven its not interested in this.  

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #130


    ArtNJ написал:

      Chess.com has proven its not interested in this.  

    а почему ?

  • 5 weeks ago · Quote · #131


    sergey960 wrote:
    ArtNJ написал:

      Chess.com has proven its not interested in this.  

    а почему ?

    Because they stated they were considering it, or that it was on the to do list, many years ago, but never did anything at all.  Yes, its possible its still on a "maybe, someday" list BUT there is no evidence its even a low priority at this point.  

Back to Top

Post your reply: