Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Chess 960 Live chess?


  • 2 months ago · Quote · #121

    sergey960

    ArtNJ написал:

     Perhaps its the lowest of low priorities, but it really seems like a dead issue.  

    Это непонятно . Если онлайн 960 шахматы появились давно одновременно с классическими , то почему нет продолжения в виде живых шахмат 960 ??

  • 7 weeks ago · Quote · #122

    stuburbsy

    I want to express that I too am waiting for 960 in Live. I'm very curious to see how my rating will be considering I've never studied openings in standard chess. Who has the time!?!?

  • 6 weeks ago · Quote · #123

    ArtNJ

    Is Lichess.org the best place to play 960 live?  I'm having trouble getting FICS working at the moment, but my recollection is that 960 wasnt that active on FICS.  I can get a game in a minute or two on Lichess, so its working ok for me at the moment.  

  • 6 weeks ago · Quote · #124

    glider1001

    Lichess is great, so is Chesscube. There are others as well. Chesscube has the longest Chess960 history. Not sure if the ICC (internet chess club) supports live 960. It baffles me that Chess.com still hasn't implemented it. Just amazing. Been trying for four years now!

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #125

    Dindra

    pk

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #126

    seeminglee

    Please implement this soon. It’s been 5 years! Recently I got into Chess960 and I have been playing it semi-live using the turn-based system and it was somewhat inconvenient. Mostly it is me using my iPhone as a move-notification system.

  • 3 weeks ago · Quote · #127

    ArtNJ

    lichess.org has it now and it works just fine.  Lichess is the best chess site in some ways.  Player base is 1/5th of here though.  

  • 4 days ago · Quote · #128

    n12o

    I would like to play chess 960 here.

  • 4 days ago · Quote · #129

    ArtNJ

    I would like a billion dollars and a harem.  People need to be realistic.  Chess.com has proven its not interested in this.  

  • 4 days ago · Quote · #130

    sergey960

    ArtNJ написал:

      Chess.com has proven its not interested in this.  

    а почему ?

  • 3 days ago · Quote · #131

    ArtNJ

    sergey960 wrote:
    ArtNJ написал:

      Chess.com has proven its not interested in this.  

    а почему ?

    Because they stated they were considering it, or that it was on the to do list, many years ago, but never did anything at all.  Yes, its possible its still on a "maybe, someday" list BUT there is no evidence its even a low priority at this point.  


Back to Top

Post your reply: