This is rude...

Sort:
happyface79
[COMMENT DELETED]
ReyRambler1960

It's just a psychological ploy that does'nt change anything for the loser.

2a3a1a

He either is a troll or just, like me, forgets to go on chess.com.

happyface79
[COMMENT DELETED]
mjm16

there is nothing you can do about it you just have to wait till the person runs out of time

every1lovesDOLPHINS

Yes that's rude!

happyface79
[COMMENT DELETED]
letsgohome
happyface79 wrote:

So I am currently in a game where I have clearly won the game BUT my opponent won't resign! HERE'S THE CATCH, Instead of resigning he is using his VACATION time just to make sure I don't win until his vacation time is up.

Any suggestions?

~Happy

Wow. That is a calumnious accusation. This is a gratuitous thread on the precarious premise of speculation. You sir are the epitome of class. Can you either enumerate your facts detailing your claims or track down the anonymous opponent delineating their confession. The irony of disparaging another, when conversely you are denigrating yourself. Good day sir and I hope you have learned a significant lesson.

batgirl

Read any good lexicons lately?

blueemu
letsgohome wrote:

The irony of disparaging one when conversely you are denigrating yourself.

This sentence ___ no verb.

Chesscoaching

contains...

letsgohome
blueemu wrote:
letsgohome wrote:

The irony of disparaging one when conversely you are denigrating yourself.

This sentence ___ no verb.

Since when is denigrate or disparage not  a verb. LMAO. Illiteracy at its finest.

blueemu

Check yous sentence again. It's not a complete sentence. It's a subjective clause.

For comparison, here is a sentence:

The irony of disparaging one when conversely you are denigrating yourself is appalling.

PLAVIN81

Stop playing with this person= You do not need this frustationFrown

letsgohome
batgirl wrote:

Read any good lexicons lately?

No, I just read. I use the internet for its primary purpose, to procure and ascertain information that will better myself, whilst giving me the necessities to help others. I don't think the intentions of  DARPA ,US military research group, who  created the internet had  watching funny youtube videos and vapid discussions or interactions as the primary purpose for it.

P.S.: Chess.com is educational and entertaining concurrently.

letsgohome
blueemu wrote:

Check yous sentence again. It's not a complete sentence. It's a subjective clause.

For comparison, here is a sentence:

The irony of disparaging one when conversely you are denigrating yourself is appalling.

Not necessarily, you would be right if you talking to anybody else, however I was using it as a stand alone statement.

i.e.: The irony of life.

That in itself is a complete sentence. 

batgirl
letsgohome wrote:
batgirl wrote:

Read any good lexicons lately?

 I don't think the intentions of  DARPA ,US military research group, who  created the internet had  watching funny youtube videos and vapid discussions or interactions as the primary purpose for it.


I don't think they had this in mind either.

blueemu
batgirl wrote:

I don't think they had this in mind either.

Correct. The Internet is for trying to sound educated and sophisticated when you don't even understand the rules of grammar.

letsgohome
batgirl wrote:
letsgohome wrote:
batgirl wrote:

Read any good lexicons lately?

 I don't think the intentions of  DARPA ,US military research group, who  created the internet had  watching funny youtube videos and vapid discussions or interactions as the primary purpose for it.


I don't think they had this in mind either.

You were enlightened by me, since you now know that DARPA created the internet. I believe that is in the confines of the purpose of the internet, to exchange knowledge as a means to add value. Operative word is research, DARPA is what? It is a US military RESEARCH group. Research and information is inextricably linked, brah.

letsgohome
blueemu wrote:
batgirl wrote:

I don't think they had this in mind either.

Correct. The Internet is for trying to sound educated and sophisticated when you don't even understand the rules of grammar.

LMAO. Coming from someone who didn;t know that denigrate and disparage were verbs. LMAO. I think you need a re-education on verbs and syntax, brah. LOL. 

See post 19 brah.