14360 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
you grew a moustache?
I let my epaulette grow out.
i thought it was a tassel. yours makes more sense.
i'm a half-wit and i got half of it in less than an hour.
thats why you can only solve half
Uh-oh, Driver's License Guy just zapped ya good, flagsy!
I'll throw in a dark horse vote for crushing 10 consecutive beer cans against your forehead.
Yeah, even Meat Loaf couldn't do that!
I think solving the rubiks cube is easier. I onced played with a stinking chess master and it was so bad. Two scenarios: He was definitely stronger than me at chess but his breath and armpit odor was much much stronger.
Rubil's cube has more combinations than there are forum posts about the number of possible chess positions.
with help. but parts i got on my own.
Solving a Rubik's cube is easy. I can do it in less than five minutes just about every time. Playing a chess master is easier though, since you don't really have to devote any effort to play chess.
Which of these is harder:
1. Solving a Rubik's cube blindfold
2. Beating a chess master blindfold
Then there is that perplexing problem of why you'd want to solve a Rubik's cube.
I solve cubes blindfolded regularly, it's really not that hard. It obviously takes much less training than getting good enough at chess to beat a chess master, let alone blindfolded.
Rubiks cube definately. I can do that in about a minute.
Once, a long time ago, I beat a Master in a tournament game, but I will never be able to solve a rubik's cube.
You would if you try... it's not THAT hard. It's only deceptively hard.
Rubik's cube can be solved from any position by following a simple algorithm. Once you know the algorithm, it's merely a matter of applying it.
The same is not true of beating a chess master.
As is, the rubiks cube is much harder.
If you asked the question properly, beating a chess master is much harder.
Its easier to play a chess master, than solve a cube. You said PLAY, not win!
OPG(Other Peoples Games)
by anpu3 a few minutes ago
Leechers of chess.com
by teletolumby a few minutes ago
Could a 2000 rated player beat Magnus Carlsen?
by chessredpanda a few minutes ago
Making the Chess.com Forums Better
by nameno1had 7 minutes ago
Rate the avatar above - II ( The return)
by KingInTheNorth77 10 minutes ago
The King's Gambit
by jetfighter13 13 minutes ago
Mate in 4
by mic15counterstrategy 15 minutes ago
Games against this kind of Alekhine defense
by konhidras 15 minutes ago
Astounding Positional Sacrifice - Mikhail Tal's Trainer
by jetfighter13 15 minutes ago
Sicilian Grand Prix as black
by Citadel_7 15 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!