Forums

More blunders and some good stuff

Sort:
Radical_Drift

Hello!

After playing what I consider to be a good game in round 3, I play a game with many twists and turns in round 4 that involves quite a few mistakes. In my defense, it was at 9:00 a.m. This was part of why I ended up drifting into a worse position... but then I woke up and started finding nice ideas in what I consider a lost position. However, when given the opportunity to draw by force, I decide to play on in a misguided hope of winning the game. My stubbornness bears fruit when my opponent blunders into a mate in one, but then, in time trouble, I miss it. My mind was thinking, "Just get the draw" at this point, leading me to miss it. Please help me analyze this complicated effort.

Thanks,

chessman


 

Radical_Drift

Now I see why Fischer hated this thing!

Radical_Drift

Yes, it is...

Joker-Jamal

Quiet interesting game!

Thanks chessman1504!

Radical_Drift
Joker-Jamal wrote:

Quiet interesting game!

Thanks chessman1504!

Yeah, it was pretty quiet. Maybe some rudimentary opening study could help someone like me, with these tendencies for quiet games with White. I think having a solid repertoire with Black is okay, but with White, I should get better positions than I do. I have to applaud my opponent. Before gaining the advantage, he played very very well in my opinion.

Joker-Jamal

You seem you neeed to have higher rating than you have now ;)

Radical_Drift

Yeah, my rating was a year old. My USCF has gone up to 1585 after this one tournament! :)

Joker-Jamal

Awesome!

isayoldboy

Very interesting game.

He could have put you in check with 18... bh2+

 

Radical_Drift

isayoldboy wrote:

Very interesting game.

He could have put you in check with 18... bh2+

 

Well, yes, but I'm not sure it accomplishes anything for him.

Joker-Jamal

Bh2 gives nothing cause bishop should run back because of g3 move

isayoldboy

Respectfully disagree. When the bishop does run back to d6, which I guess is the only viable square, white will exchange bishops, which will result in a much more open board for black. ie he will be using his space more effectively, will untangle his pieces faster. kinda sharp?

 

Please convince me I am wrong lol

Rosenbalm

I am still an amateur, but I think black should have played 4... Nxd5 instead of 4... exd5.

After...

4. exd5 nxd5

5. nxd5 qxd5

...black is a tempo up with total control of the center and all the initiative.

isayoldboy

That line is a common enough one in the chesstempo database. Devastating.