13631 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
Along with minor other mistakes, your trap is unsound. If White had played 30.b3, you would have lost a piece (...Bf1 Kg2) instead of won one.
This reminds me why I don't like the "game showcase" forum...
... if b3 i would have exchanged saced my rook for his knight and got at least a pawn compensation and i would like to see your so called mistakes because i certaintley don't see any and if you don't like the game showcase forum don't view it then idiot
i don't get it my bishop and king could form a blockade??
One of your bishops is paralysed by the pawn during the time you need to bring the king ; meanwhile, the white pieces take care of the a and b pawn. After what, Black is just down an exchange.
i don't see your point??
Your line 34.Kg1 is a loss of time. White must aggress the pawns as soon as possible, and Black push them while keeping them safe before the white king comes. For example :
agreeing with irontiger's analysis, your trap was unsound since the refusion isn't equality or an edge for you it's dead lost. bishop vs rook endgame is pretty impossible to draw with pawns on the board, the rook is too strong.
you should really look at my anaylsis...
you should really look at the analysis posted just below yours which suggests endgame improvements. sacrificing the exchange may seem perfectly fine at that point but look ahead and you'll see the rook easily wins the pawns back. i had a game once where my opponent sacrificed the exchange for 3 pawns and still lost due to the strength of a rook compared to a minor piece.
also maybe you should be a little less rude when people are trying to give you advice?
Well, I wasn't really kind-hearted either, so I understand his answer. My excuse is that posting in "game showcase" when actually the crucial point is not so brilliant as it seems (but maybe play could be improved from my analysis), with good faith, is the proof that posting in "game analysis" first should be done. And then why post it in "game showcase" if it is already posted...
a picture of a broken chess player
by Stevie65 5 minutes ago
Software for my own Analysis (not engine Analysis)
by Journeyman_Jim 8 minutes ago
Please criticize me
by moonnie 20 minutes ago
Paulsen VS Najdorf !
by bongcloudftw 22 minutes ago
by leiph15 24 minutes ago
FICS Standard Games
by BoardOfWar 29 minutes ago
12/27/2014 - Levenfish-Ryumin, Moscow 1936
by yoursisnodisgrace 30 minutes ago
Windows Phone 8 Beta Testers Needed
by Makragic 36 minutes ago
Why do you like playing chess?
by leiph15 61 minutes ago
How To Stop The Time PoP-Up Window??
by PolarChess 90 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!