17340 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
In the game below I used the technique of addressing the imblances to win the game. The Technique is in Silman's book "The Amateur's mind".
After exchanging a knight for a bishop, I sought to remove my oponents possible outpost squares and, more importantly, I started opening up the board in order to increase the power of my extra fianchettoed bishop. The imblance was that I had the extra bishop and he had the extra knight, so I attempted the make the board favour bishops.
And in fact, it was the very same fianchettoed bishop that won the game with a rather nice move. So, thoughts?
8..c5 would have been nice to see, trying to tear open the diagonal for the fianchettoed bishop. You allowed him to build a big centre and queenside space advantage without challenging it, which is ok if it hadn't of been for 15...b5? which cements his space advantage while trying to harass a piece that needs to move into a better position anyway. Luckily 16.bxc5? was played instead of Nb2( to be followed by Nd4 maybe).
It's good that you were aware of the imbalance, but would have been better to see you try and accentuate it by tearing through the diagonal at some point. 25.e4? luckily solved that problem for you.11. c5 works too, as the e-pawn is pinned 'cos of the bishop's latent pressure, but even 11.h4 followed by c5 would have been a good plan too.
It's funny about 11.Bd3? White doesn't want to exchange because he has a space advantage but neither do you because of the bishop pair. At least not yet.
oh, and well spotted tactic.
Your opponent had the center. Which is confusing to me as i never saw a player just let the game slip away in this position. I think if your opponent had the knowledge you would have lost. He had chances to get that knight to an outpost and take away your use of a file.
Thanks for the helpful comments guys, hopefully next time I can implement my plan instead of just knowing it!
Are tactics really the way to go?
by Warbringer33 a few minutes ago
5/28/2015 - Mate in 3
by m_majid_khan a few minutes ago
Fisher or Kasparov
by stuzzicadenti 4 minutes ago
Wooden Chess set
by Teichmann70 5 minutes ago
How to play against the Pillsbury setup in the Slav?
by bb_gum234 9 minutes ago
Weather Chess.com should allow computers to play with suspected chess cheaters?
by Murgen 9 minutes ago
Scheveningen vs. Najdorf
by nwt1000 12 minutes ago
What if you went to a live tournament and no one came except for you?
by pickchua5 13 minutes ago
When opponents don't grant you a 2nd game
by shakedaspear 14 minutes ago
Bobby Fischer Lacked Creativity ?....How Dare Me !
by Stavros_34 17 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!