10024 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I think that the intent to manipulate one's rating in order to play in a ratings limited tournament is ethically suspect, whether one does so by purposely losing games or by selecting what games one plays (i.e., only playing opponents likely to beat you). My rule of thumb for judging whether an action is moral or ethical is to act yourself (1) whether you would condone the behavior in others (i.e., if someone else engaged in the conduct, would you be bothered or irritated if it affected you?) and (2) whether you would be embarrassed if your mother or the public knew that you had engaged in your conduct (and your intent in taking the action). If you honestly answer the first question with yes and the second question with no, then the action may be ethical. However, if you are unable to answer those questions yes and no respectively, then it is likely that your conscience perceives the action as unethical.
Thanks -- I am very glad to know that! I did not realize that
@pt22064 another thoughtful response, thank you!
@ Renate, I thought you didn't realize that. ;)
Somebody once "jokingly" accused me of sandbagging because I once had a 1764 USCF OTB rating. That was about 35 years ago; I`m now 66 and at my "floor" of 1500. The average player is simply much better, I did not want to do the work to keep my edge and I got older. I got a "second life" with USCF Correspondence Chess and now have a 2065 rating in that. It suits my temperment better and I don`t "choke" as much when I`m winning games. Many fit my profile on this.
I'll have to agree that the average player must have gotten much better. Thanks to the rise of computers and the internet they can play and learn much more effectively.
And 66 - wow, I don't think I'll ever get that old!
I think the turn-based chess on here suits me better, as well. Less pressure and more time to think combined with the analyze board and access to an opening book database makes for a better played game.
there is a possible communication answer
in answer to the forum question i would recommend contacting your group admin ask them to contact the opposing admin ie other group admin asking if they could field a similar rated player this may involve a temporary match closure and reopen with diff grade level but worth a shot
Thanks for trying to help Nedluddite :), but this was a purely hypothetical question. It had occurred to me when I noticed players ratings rising in between registration and the start of a team match. I wanted other peoples input on whether they felt it was ethical or not.
it can be a case where a player just gets a few wins esp if outgraded heavily from sign up to match start i guess i should have read the prev posts tho as i didnt get the context sorry
No Worries ;)
Thoughts on the Standard Rating Boost
by ZarkoUcinci a few minutes ago
is scandinavian a good defence
by Jay_Roy_Hall a few minutes ago
by BobBlanks 23 minutes ago
I suck at chess. Bad.
by innocuent 26 minutes ago
My standard rating only went up 200 points instead of 400?????
by astronomer999 27 minutes ago
Is this a draw
by LongIslandMark 29 minutes ago
Italian game 3...h6
by therearenonamesleft 29 minutes ago
Who's your fav in the Top Ten?
by DarknisMetalDragon 45 minutes ago
My Rating jumped 150 points.
by jhamesbryan24 52 minutes ago
How is this good for White
by shell_knight 65 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!