Fellow chess freaks. I have decided that you have EARNED another post from me. Many people here are taking my advice and posting CREDIBLE posts. The lies have been dwindling. I have been noticing alot of CITATIONS from credible sources when you all decide to post something that cannot be taken for granted. Good job. Here is your reward.

Please refer to The Big Showdown group vote chess match between Team cheater_1 and Light Force as I will be using it to back up my claims. Team Lightforce was the only team on this site that had the courage to go toe to toe with me, so please give them a hand.

As you all know, I possess chess skills that far exceed even ANAND. I can hear you all laughing now, but it is true. If ANAND were to sit across from cheater_1 and his UNMATEABLE program CANNIBAL 37, he would LOSE. As you all know, in my nearly 1 million online games, I have never been checkmated once and have beaten 3 GMs in my life, and the GM games were 40/120. LEGIT TOURNEY GAMES.

Now, listen up. I am not making the claim that I will never lose a game on time, or take a loss because I was FORCED to resign as I was in our first vote chess game by team chess.com (bullies that they are). I am saying that I simply cannot be checkmated in a game of chess by any HUMAN, team of humans, computer program, team of computer programs, or any combination of the previous.

As many long time members of this site know, I employ my own chess knowledge (1950 uscf with 30 years of playing the game), A super chess program that I wrote that knows how to draw even the toughest of opponents (it's win percentage is 3% its loss percentage is ZERO%, and its draw percentage is 97%), and an extensive understanding of psychology that allows me to manipulate my opponents. Combine these elements and you have me...THE UNMATEABLE ONE.

Please refer to The Big Showdown now. Look at the board. Do you all remember my number one chess COMMANDMENT? ATTACK THE CENTER NO MATTER WHAT IS HAPPENING TO YOU. Ignore attacks on your pieces elsewhere. DO NOT defend in ANY circumstance unless there is a check upon you. Look at my pieces PUNISHING the center. Look at how my king is running about without a care. I am dividing and conquering. Look at my development, it is like a spear pointing at their heart. Look at my IMPENETRABLE pawn wall. I dont care a hoot about his king. Going for the king is not what it's about.....at this point.

Now, Team lightforce is no slouch. Last I heard there were dozens of people on that team, many running deep fritz and rybka. Look at how just little old me and my homemade program LURED them in. Like a spider luring an ant. They want my king so bad that they and their "commercial" chess programs couldn't see what I had in store for them. Do you see it? They just LOST their rook when I get my turn. I am attacking the Queen AND the ROOK. Too bad I'm not planning on going on vacation so you can DENY me a vacation and take the "win" like team chess.com did. SORRY.

17 moves into the game and it's all but OVER. DOZENS of top notch computer programs couldnt manage to pull off even a draw with me. Heck, my win percentage may go from 3% to 3.5% now.

Remember my rules. NEVER DEFEND, The top chess players in the world were NEVER known for their defensive playing. Develop your pieces toward the center, or at least have them attacking central squares. The fianchetto is more often than not the kiss of death when developing pieces. Push to the center, good things will happen. King safety is overrated. Use the king as bait. Bring him into the fight and gain an advantage.

I suspect team lightforce will resign shortly. When they do, is there any TEAM out there that has the GUTS to go toe to toe with the UNMATEABLE ONE?

does that big ego impair your vision when u sit down at a chess board?

do u play not online? like in real- live tourneys?

Here's the current position for your analysis.

http://www.chess.com/votechess/analysis.html?id=9262030

Is that unmateable in the agricultural sense?

Bahahaha a rating of 1950 USCF and you're bragging you're better than Anand?

I'm no GM, but I find it hilarious that you pride yourself on a program that has an almost nonexistent winning capablity. What good's playing if you let your opponent win too?

And honestly, you may not get checkmated, but a resignation is the admission that a checkmate is coming. Hence, you still got beat.

dude, you need a girlfriend.

That and it doesnt help the fact that he is an airhead.. the reason he cannot be mated is coz he'd resign when he's gonna lose and say that he was check-mated..lol.. he never ceases to amuse..

so hes saying that he quits a game before being able to lose?

qft

Yes, he's unmateable: No one well ever mate with him

 HAHAHAHAH THAT'S GOOD! Some Cheater dude do you play chess without your program if you do challenge me to an unrated game - still if you win its probably because your using your program so i can't really play you without your program so chances are if i have a game with you i'll most probably be playing the program as well okay so lets play.

I THOUGHT PROGRAMS WERE BANNED ON THIS SITE!

Actually, that's interesting advice.  Perhaps someone better than me and dispassionate towards Cheater can evaluate it better, but something to gnaw on.

Cheater, I wouldn't mind playing your program.  I'm ~1600's on here.  I got nothing to prove, just want to learn.  Send a message....

And, it's just a chess match, everybody.

biological?

Lets be fair, if the title of this thread isn't inflammatory then NOTHING is.

cheater_1,

I think that you might be overstating the number of games that you have played in your 30 years of "chess king", I almost choked writing this. It is incredibly funny when you say and I quote you: "As you all know, in my nearly 1 million online games...".

By the way you can exclude me from your finite abelian group, as I am neither part of it nor interchangeable with any of your supporters that know that you have played nearly 1 million games, your quote again: " you all.."

For my calculations, I will use 30 minutes for all games that you played and thus presume that you have played all blitz games, and some do take longer as you possibly know, and I am sure that is not the case.

I will further presume that you have played chess for 16 hours a day, consecutively or non consecutively as it is irrelevant in the calculations.

I still have not figured out how you could earn a living playing this much chess for 30 years and possibly you are a billionnaire, which I doubt.

I will as well void the extra time required when you play a master as, usually the game is much longer.

So here I go and I am using 800,000 games that you played, not 1 million:

(800,000 x 0.5 hour per game)/(divided by) 16 hours per day playing chess is 25,000 hours of chess, using 365 days a year a reasonnable number, this yielsd to 68 years of playing chess.

Simply, numbers do not add up!

What about the other facts that you write? Are they as unreliable or biased as this simple calculation?

This is called in my language a "snow job"

Now about your great game!, I will not comment for now as the game is in progress, but I will tell you that in the very first few moves, black played 3 very wrong moves and as the game progresses thete are many more bad moves from the opponent side.

And I am not blaming black team for their play, but it leaves me to wonder on your real strength challenging a group of players that you know that you will likely beat easily.

This is not the trade mark of a true chess player.

You are at best an entertainer but certainly not a chess player, if you had played against me, I would have taken care of your opening in a jiffy.

So in closing you are playing a con game with us, I am not that naive, please revise your premisses, what you say you have done, and bring them in perspective for 2009, you still have a few days to rectify yourself or repent.

No, I think he means unmateable in the "Shoe sense" ... as in, there will never be Another to make a Pair ... aren't we lucky to have the only one~!?  heheh

A quick observation- that team lightsaber which you claim to be 'strong' made a very very weak move. I'm talking about that king-pawn push they went for on move 2. Plays out perfectly, for you.

You know, regardless of that, they didn't play really well anyway. Thier attack was pretty weak. In my opinion, a good player puts his opponent into situations that are hard to handle, and is able to capitalize on small startegic and tacic defects in his opponent's play. You didn't do any of these, your opponent just blundered around. In my opinion, this game (and the fact that you are winning it currently) proves nothing of your skill.

Also, I think that other people might have noticed too, the link you posted above is to a vote chess 'analysis board' (note the upper-right corner). Also, regularly, as you progress through the game in view mode (and analysis mode), the current move is highlighted with a yellow square around it. That does not exist in your link. Smells fake to me.

Your proof is clearly false as well as empty and meaningless, but that doesn't matter. I posted a replay. Enjoyed it, too.

I concur with you, I did not want to make any calls against black's moves, but the game makes no sense to me either, cheater_1's opponents play like a 1200 or 1300 level player or less, nothing to brag about!

"and an extensive understanding of psychology that allows me to manipulate my opponents..."

This made me laugh. So you yell at your opponents while a program makes moves for you?

Also, the statement that you are unmateable is technically true, seeing as you are never the one making the moves, so you never play. I could refuse to play another game of chess and call myself unmateable too, with less exclamation points.

I didn't know that you would declare to us that you were a virgin in all caps. Thats bold, even for you!