18833 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
If it's just those random unexplainable errors, then it seems there would be the same chance that a 1300 would beat a 2500, 2600, 2700, etc. because it's not due to any quality of knowledge or skill the individual has, but on these errors that seem to happen on their own.
When I, as a mere 1700, have dropped a piece against a 1300, I have usually come back to win.
As a 1300 I won a queen for a knight against an expert and lost. It was a 20 minute game but still...
i think if the new player join in chess.com but its rating is higer than 2700 in outside it can be...
Elubas: In regards to the monkey, you are correct. To put this in chess terms, if an infinite number of monkeys played Magnus Carlsen, some of them will beat him. Well, actually that's an incorrect statement - to be accurate, an infinite number of monkeys will beat him. Both the number of games played and the number of games won by the monkeys are "countable infinities," you see...
The point to understand is this: when you play chess, all the moves are right there in front of you. If you happen to pick the right ones (even if you know nothing about chess strategy and just make random moves), you too can play like a grandmaster. Given that, the odds of the stronger player winning is never 100%.
In a 50 move game A lot of 1300`s plays maybe 45 moves as a GM now and then, and maybe 4 inaccuracies and one bad move. In such games they will loose.
A Gm usually plays 50 or 49, og maybe 48 moves as a GM.
In his best games the 1300 have more Gm-like moves.
This is of course based on empty guesswork, and might not be true at all, but I can see from chess.com computeranalyze that in my best game when I was close to 1300 fide (which I have never been, my first rating was 1422), that ther were only two inaccuracies, and those two was the moves leading to a victorious line.
But that wasnt against a GM. The GM made me move bad. He pushed so hard that I played out of balance. It is much easier to play clean games against normal strenght players.
Once Fritz scored my game as having zero errors.
Doesn't mean much. I eventually lost a pawn and the game.
A few inaccuracies and 1 blunder is more like GM level play. 1300, held to the same standard, is more like 50% of the moves are inaccuracies and multiple game losing blunders.
"Tradewise Gibraltar Chess Festival Round 4! Hosts IM Elisabeth Paehtz & GM Simon Williams "
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by leiph18 a few minutes ago
1/30/2015 - White Draws
by randomuser101 2 minutes ago
Analysis for both sides.
by wrathss 3 minutes ago
by leiph18 9 minutes ago
Exactly When to Sing "J'adoube" to unnerve your opponent
by Jenium 19 minutes ago
i suck soooooo bad
by SinDaHouse 19 minutes ago
Chicas habla hispana-español
by MSC157 24 minutes ago
Becoming a Grand Master - Help Please
by leiph18 25 minutes ago
Sicilian for beginners
by csalami 26 minutes ago
Why I suck at blitz chess
by leiph18 33 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!