7155 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
NinjaBear
I've recently become interested in solving puzzles where you determine if a position is legal or not. For example, is this position legal?
Can someone produce a position that is legal AND illegal (depending on if the puzzle is white or black to move)? I should also add that neither side is in check.
Have fun...
JOH
Pebandon
Two black-colored bishops. No way for White to promote a Pawn as Black's Pwan wall isn't broken.
MRO314
Thank you MRO314. It appears that it is just the definition of a stalemate!
nqi
Illegal. White would have had to move one of his queens to either c7 or b6 while the other was already at the other of those squares, meaning that Black would have had to move while in stalemate.
Blackadder
pompom
Yes, here is an example:
If it is white to move, this is legal. If this was black to move, this is not legal.
xbigboy
legal or illegal?
it's obviously illegal because there are no kings on the board.
I'm finding this humorous.
Interesting.
MugglesMan
Elegant solution in post #8 pompom. It made me smile.
sgt_pepper
I disagree. White could bring his knight out, then black could, then white could bring a second knight out, then black could bring his knight back in. White brings a knight in, black puts a knight out, white puts a knight out, black brings his knight in, white brings a knight in black puts a knight out, white brings a... Yeah this isn't working out.
yeah, that is genious.
yeah, the knights can't lose a tempo (because it goes from a light square to a dark square and a dark square to a light square) and the rooks have only one square to go to.
Here are some more:
Georgewang
This position would be legal if it was black to move, but illegal if if was white to move
This is illegal no matter who's move it is impossible because there is no way the bishop could have gone to h8 as pawns can't move backwards and g7 is blocked!
Tenna
That bishop could have been a promoted pawn.
Yes, I just said that the bishop was promoted.
diemking
very interesting topic
The 2012 World Championship of Chess!
by jesterville a few minutes ago
chessblood (white) vs. ChristianSoldier007 (black) WITH KIBITZERS!
by chessblood 7 minutes ago
Forgot user name and password.
by CMC_Stoker 8 minutes ago
Wht Bobby Fischer would have beaten Kasparov.
by TheProfessor 11 minutes ago
Interesting game. Please help.
by eddysallin 17 minutes ago
Multiple team membership
by joygaros 19 minutes ago
5/26/2012 - Ragozin - Veresov, Moscow 1945
by stephen_33 20 minutes ago
Sparring partner + chess friend
by TheProfessor 23 minutes ago
Players not acting like their rating?
by Anonymous_U 31 minutes ago
''Gift from Viswanathan Anand''
by AnnaZC 41 minutes ago