12291 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
The Deep Rybka 4.1 SSE42 x64 vs Houdini 1.5a x64 100 - game match with long time controls is over.
Final Score: Rybka 51 - Houdini 49
Format: 2 hours for first 40 moves, 2 hours for next 40 moves, 90 minutes + 30 seconds/move for the rest of the game.
Hardware: AMD Phenom(tm) 9750 Quad-Core Processor with 8 GBs Memory
Operating System: Windows 7 Professional SP1 (Build 7600) 64-bit
Tablebases: Gaviota & Nalimov 3-4-5 piece EGTBs on an SSD
Opening Book: Generic books up to move 10
Hash Size: 2,048 MBs
For the first 50 games, the engines chose the openings at random (up to move 10), but they did NOT have to play both White and Black for each opening. For the last 50 games, I chose the openings (up to move 10), and they DID have to play both White and Black for each opening. The score for the first 50 games was a tie. The score for the last 50 games was +2 for Rybka.
See the games here: http://www.westportchessclub.org/computer-chess/rybka-vs-houdini-100-games-match.htm
From a software perspective, how do you guarantee that an engine's algorithm doesn't appropriate cpu/ram/cache resources in an unfair manner while running alongside the other engine?
well, i don't know how to guarantee it. i did monitor the engines in windows performance monitor--which watches cpu/ram/disk/etc--before running the tournament. they seemed to be switching on and off 100% when it was or wasn't their turn. try it.
Still an impressive performance for a freeware chess engine. It's clearly the engine to use if you cannot afford the latest Deep Rybka, and arguably should be used as an 2nd opinion even with the use of Rybka.
After running this match and watching them grind away at similar positions in games 51-100, I can say I fully agree with the statement that it is faster. better, though? depends on the position.
What would you say is the most interesting game (or games) of all these? Has anyone done an analysis of them?
Were there any novelties by the computers?
most interesting? can't really say. depends on people's preferences, really. there were interesting *moments*, though. some really surprising moves. i can't remember any specific ones right now. i should make a web page for each win, so people can see the games. hmmm... i would love for people to analyze them, do an eco breakdown, etc.
yes. several. i am sorry i can't remember them. i think i will create a web page for each win, so people can watch the games w/o having to cut and paste the PGNs and view them themselves.
The link does not work any more. Any idea where the PGN of these games could be found?
im not able to access the games anymore =(.
could you give another link
4/1/2015 - Bringing The Enemy In
by mustitz 4 minutes ago
Cannot login to the website using Facebook
by 4purv 6 minutes ago
by KM101 7 minutes ago
by Blackenne 11 minutes ago
Tactics puzzle 2
by vc153415 13 minutes ago
The power of 2 Rooks against a queen
by leiph18 16 minutes ago
by leiph18 17 minutes ago
1000 point rating boost for april fool's day
by leiph18 21 minutes ago
I luke the site, overall
by Blackenne 22 minutes ago
Luck in Chess
by leiph18 23 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!