Forums

what type of player are you

Sort:
royalbishop

Yeah i have 2 lives also. I have live in the light and dark.

landwehr

reckless and unstable

Yeninghunba

I play according to my opponent. I think I am positional.

royalbishop
landwehr wrote:

reckless and unstable

Is that you?

Did somebody chain you to the computer? If you are being held hostage just type HHHH ok?

913Glorax12

HHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!

lol!

kiwi-inactive
theoreticalboy wrote:

Bad.

lol 

I'd say I am an attacker. 

SandyJames

Totally lost and washed out Sealed

TetsuoShima

my style could be considered blind,antipositional, crazy and unfathomable hope chess.

gramps33

I just try to find the best move.

Mandy711

HHHHHHHHHHHHHH!!!

tariklee

I try not the rush but it so hard!!!Yell

Time4Tea

I like to try to tie the game up in a big tactical knot that's so complicated that neither of us can understand it, then hope their brain explodes before mine does.  Doesn't always work, but I like to try anyway ...  ;-)  Other than that, I'm a big fan of tying up and trapping my opponent's pieces  :-)  .

JustinGriggs

I would say that right now I am what I would call an "experimenter".  I am still relatively inexperienced with low ratings.  I experiment with ideas that I read in books, watch on youtube, etc. and see what happens.  As I do this I figure out what works and what doesn't.  While I do many different ideas, I'm more of an attacker and tactician.  As I develop my skill this is what I expect my style will be.

popopop1234567890
[COMMENT DELETED]
popopop1234567890
rmurray wrote:

Flute.   ?

ya i totally understand ure specifec type of disorder

popopop1234567890
rmurray wrote:
popopop1234567890 wrote:

i am the most hated player on chess.com cause i am a big fat sour loser i always resigen bec i hate ppl i am a robot i come from ure moms pu$$y cause she cheats on ure dad

I was just thinking to myself how these forums remind me of "The Jerry Springer Show", and wouldn' you know it, bam.....get a load of this.....the lowest common denominator....way to go chess.com

i dont rlly understand ure insult please think of an insult that evryone will understand not just geeks like u lmaoooooo

JustinGriggs
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:

I would say that right now I am what I would call an "experimenter".  I am still relatively inexperienced with low ratings.  I experiment with ideas that I read in books, watch on youtube, etc. and see what happens.  As I do this I figure out what works and what doesn't.  While I do many different ideas, I'm more of an attacker and tactician.  As I develop my skill this is what I expect my style will be.

Dude.... you are an "experimenter", and a .....loser.  Why not try standard chess, and think about what your doing.  Isn't "experimenter", experimentor?

First off, I have been playing seriously for about 2 or 3 weeks, so don't expect me to win every game.  As I said in my original post I try different openings, endgame strategies, ect.  to find out what works and what doesn't - that is how I learn.  That is the way new things come about and people learn new things, so please explain to me what is wrong with experimenting.

I'll leave you with this:

"If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward". - Thomas Edison

JustinGriggs
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:
rmurray wrote:
jmandell wrote:

I would say that right now I am what I would call an "experimenter".  I am still relatively inexperienced with low ratings.  I experiment with ideas that I read in books, watch on youtube, etc. and see what happens.  As I do this I figure out what works and what doesn't.  While I do many different ideas, I'm more of an attacker and tactician.  As I develop my skill this is what I expect my style will be.

Dude.... you are an "experimenter", and a .....loser.  Why not try standard chess, and think about what your doing.  Isn't "experimenter", experimentor?

First off, I have been playing seriously for about 2 or 3 weeks, so don't expect me to win every game.  As I said in my original post I try different openings, endgame strategies, ect.  to find out what works and what doesn't - that is how I learn.  That is the way new things come about and people learn new things, so please explain to me what is wrong with experimenting.

I'll leave you with this:

"If I find 10,000 ways something won't work, I haven't failed. I am not discouraged, because every wrong attempt discarded is another step forward". - Thomas Edison

Yeah.....like i said..."take another step forward", and play standard chess and think about what youre doing.  You will learn more.

 "It is advisable to ....Think ...before doing....Anything"   Sidhartha

What is "standard chess"?  I didn't know that everyone has to play the exact same way. 

royalbishop

[ What is "standard chess"?  I didn't know that everyone has to play the exact same way. ]

We all have to try to mate the opponents King to win.

JustinGriggs

I'm kind of ADHD and impulsive, so I tend to play fast.  My brain makes connections fast and patience and thinking the decisions through is one of the things that I'm working on.  I am playing some day long turn games, but I try to play a lot of live chess to better suit my high speed brain.