10481 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I was thinking that people have better things to do than comparing players which were born with a difference of 153 years. Apparently I was completely wrong.
Yep phren, you were wrong.
I think better question is "who was more talented - Carlsen or Morphy?" to which I'd answer Carlsen still.
hmm maybe you are right...
but nowadays there is a lot of technological improvement and our brains have evolved so if carlsen was in the era of paul i think carlsen would be more than a machine for them!so i choose carlsen and morphy see this game played by paul morphy and see the brilliancy!
thus, this game shows morphy's brilliance but i still think carlsen is much better than morphy!
Who is better?
Mikhail Chigorin, or Tigran Petrosian?
Que es mas macho?Lightbulb or Schoolbus?
I am better, superior, stronger, excellente, overpowered, than carlsen in my dreams!
If Morphy was time machined to this month there would be at least 2000 people who could beat him in a match.
Morphy would be crushed by any modern IM.
Paul Morphy had an amazing ability to learn new things from his strong opponents. In his match vs Harrwitz he lost first 2 games, then he won 5. In his match vs Anderssen he lost 1st, drew 2nd and then he started winning, but Anderssen also learned from Morphy, albeit slower, and fought back later with 1 additional victory and 1 draw.
So if Morphy faced Carlsen in a match, he would lose 1-3 initial games and then turn it around. Therefore, Carlsen should win short FIDE knockout match, Morphy any other longer match.
Why is the most powerful, versatile and indispensable chess piece a woman?
by kleelof a few minutes ago
ღ OFFICIAL 2014 Chess.com Awards ღ
by Syd_Arthur 5 minutes ago
I said a single not offensive bad word and have been expelled from live chess
by QueenNeha 8 minutes ago
Let's Gambit! Wait... should I?
by incinci 13 minutes ago
Wooden Chess Sets in India
by Robert_Philley 22 minutes ago
Analysis requested - won after a passive opening.
by gmbchess 25 minutes ago
Why does white always move first, isn't this giving white an unfair advantage?
by batgirl 25 minutes ago
Lonon Classic,Carlsen beats Kramnik
by ghostofmaroczy 31 minutes ago
Who Will Win?
by TheGoalkeeper 31 minutes ago
How many distinct chess games are possible, and which is the longest?
by kiloNewton 37 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2014 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!