Forums

Return of the Big Boob Troll

Sort:
JamieDelarosa

This guy was identified and first reported 14 days ago.

Here is his avatar today:

[Image and Link Removed by Moderator - Please do not repost this material in the forums.]

I can post his previous half dozen avatars on this account too, but I think the current one will finally get staff attention.  Sorry, but the support ticket didn't work.

johnmusacha

Okay so what did this person do?

johnmusacha

That photograph makes me laugh out loud, though.

Notice how the breasts are a different skin tone than the rest of the torso? 

And the the background is slanted like they were going for some Expressionistic vibe, brah.  Either that or they were doing the photo shoot during an earthquake.

Conquistador

Keep us abreast on the situation.

johnmusacha
Conquistador wrote:

Keep us abreast on the situation.

What's up, brah?  How's O-Town treatin ya?

JamieDelarosa

The man who who is posting as VaLeNia_RuBY is a breast fetishist.  He is also a liar, having claimed the prior avatars were actually him, when in fact they were of a Korean softcore porn model.

He is here to take advantage of the gullible.  At the same time he objectifies women and makes the site less safe for every real woman here.

Conquistador

Still going.  It's nice that everything you could want is all in the same area.

Conquistador
JamieDelarosa wrote:

The man who who is posting as VaLeNia_RuBY is a breast fetishist.  He is also a liar, having claimed the prior avatars were actually him, when in fact they were of a Korean softcore porn model.

He is here to take advantage of the gullible.  At the same time he objectifies women and makes the site less safe for every real woman here.

Middle Earth called, they want their white knight back.

johnmusacha
Conquistador wrote:

Still going.  It's nice that everything you could want is all in the same area.

Excellent, good to hear, brah.

sftac

Are you able to prove that he is not that Korean softcore porn model?  Else, your remarks here appear to be attacking a fellow member (best to leave such determinations up to site staff imo).

sftac

johnmusacha
JamieDelarosa wrote:

The man who who is posting as VaLeNia_RuBY is a breast fetishist.  He is also a liar, having claimed the prior avatars were actually him, when in fact they were of a Korean softcore porn model.

He is here to take advantage of the gullible.  At the same time he objectifies women and makes the site less safe for every real woman here.

Also making the site less safe for those who value quality photography.

See, they removed the photo.  Put it on a tripod, brah, what do they think this is, 1966?

sftac

That and perhaps the skin's under a wee bit of stress which would tend to lighten its colour.

sftac

johnmusacha
Mersaphe wrote:
johnmusacha wrote:

Notice how the breasts are a different skin tone than the rest of the torso? 

That's because boobs are usually covered up. Why do you think women have tan lines? The parts of your body/skin that you expose less will be a different color compared to the rest of your body.

What the heck kinda Quaker Amish colony are you living in, brah?  Get with the times.

sftac

While covering breasts is not legally required for many areas (Ontario in my country comes to mind), (sadly imo) a lot of women choose to cover them for assorted reasons so they're usually covered when out in daylight and much less tan than the rest of the body.

sftac

JamieDelarosa
sftac wrote:

Are you able to prove that he is not that Korean softcore porn model?  Else, your remarks here appear to be attacking a fellow member (best to leave such determinations up to site staff imo).

sftac

Yes, I am.  This person has a track record for posting porn avatars, and has admitted being a male.

Your naivete borders on the ridiculous.

JamieDelarosa
Conquistador wrote:
JamieDelarosa wrote:

The man who who is posting as VaLeNia_RuBY is a breast fetishist.  He is also a liar, having claimed the prior avatars were actually him, when in fact they were of a Korean softcore porn model.

He is here to take advantage of the gullible.  At the same time he objectifies women and makes the site less safe for every real woman here.

Middle Earth called, they want their white knight back.

Typical male response - downplaying the issue.

Here is a typical female response - blocked.

JamieDelarosa
JamieDelarosa wrote:

This guy was identified and first reported 14 days ago.

Here is his avatar today:

[Image and Link Removed by Moderator - Please do not repost this material in the forums.]

I can post his previous half dozen avatars on this account too, but I think the current one will finally get staff attention.  Sorry, but the support ticket didn't work.

Thanks, Mr/Ms/Mx Mod.

Let's not wait two weeks to respond to actionable intelligence.  This troll has so many "tells," he is one of the easier ones to ferret out.

I wonder why the account is still active and the avatar remains?  14:45 Pacific time

JamieDelarosa
sftac wrote:

While covering breasts is not legally required for many areas (Ontario in my country comes to mind), (sadly imo) a lot of women choose to cover them for assorted reasons so they're usually covered when out in daylight and much less tan than the rest of the body.

sftac

Like rape.

kleelof

Next time you are going to post questionable images, please do after 6pm EST time so I am awake and can see them.

Thanks.

kleelof
JamieDelarosa wrote:
sftac wrote:

While covering breasts is not legally required for many areas (Ontario in my country comes to mind), (sadly imo) a lot of women choose to cover them for assorted reasons so they're usually covered when out in daylight and much less tan than the rest of the body.

sftac

Like rape.

Suposedly, rape is about power and control, not physical desire. So, suposedly, being bare breasted would not raise a womans chances of be raped.

This forum topic has been locked