21000 Players currently online!
Man vs. Machine - good luck!
Turn-based games at any time!
Vote for the best move to win!
Do you have what it takes?
Backgammon, Yatzy, and more!
Sharpen your tactical vision!
Get advice and game insights!
Learn from top players & pros!
View millions of master games!
Your virtual chess coach!
Perfect your opening moves!
Test your skills vs. computer!
Find the right private coach!
Can you solve it each day?
Bring it all together!
Beginners, start here!
Make friends & play team games!
News from the world of chess!
Search all Chess.com members!
Find local clubs & events!
Who's the best of your friends?
Read what members are saying!
I am requesting that in game anaylsis, our opponents' inaccuracies would be shown also. Currently, their mistakes and blunders are only shown.
I think it gives wrong impressions, of our opponent always making the best move, perhaps when they aren't, because it isn't being shown.
It would not only prompt us to see what the best move was when we realize that it wasn't played, but also, it could help us to better visualize how a position should be played, without having to play a game, trying to duplicate the circumstances. It might not make it to that position, even if we try.
Having this feature would also be a good indicator of our opponents' honesty. If you play them, especially several games and they never make an inaccuracy, it should be a red flag, especially with the system Chess.com has in place. It calls the 1.....c5 for the Sicilian Defense an inaccuracy, if you don't play 1.....e5 for the King's Pawn game.
Yeah, the chess.com analysis is often BS for the first several moves (or more) when it comes to judging what's sound or not. On the other hand it's still way better than nothing and doesn't suck up any resources on your PC.
Get over it and download Arena (free), Houdini, Stockfish, and other free world-class chess playing programs and use them to analyze your games with in more detail. I don't use Arena so I don't know how well this will work, if you have the bucks buy Fritz 13 or some other megaweight chess program, you can also load other world-class engines in F13 and I'm using F12 so I'm sure F13 has the same or better game analysis features.
Or you can contact the staff with your suggestion, which I suspect will not exactly be at the top of their improvements list.
"... it could help us to better visualize how a position should be played..."
In his book, "Pawn Power In Chess", Hans Kmoch writes on page 106 that almost all openings result in one of 6 characteristic pawn structures. From 106-173 he details with diagrams, text and variations those 6 characteristic pawn structures and how to handle them from both White side and Black side.
11/30/2015 - The Art of Breaking Through
by Ray-D-OActive 4 minutes ago
Why play the Modern ...Qd6 Scandinavian?
by IronSteintz 6 minutes ago
Is there any chance that a 1300 rated player can beat a 2700 rated player?
by bjornb06 7 minutes ago
11/28/2015 - White To Draw
by Wangdawei 11 minutes ago
Could a 2000 rated player beat Magnus Carlsen?
by libyantiger 17 minutes ago
want to get insulted for free ?
by robbie_1969 23 minutes ago
The Power of Language (in Chess)
by bjornb06 23 minutes ago
justus williams beat magnus
by libyantiger 25 minutes ago
by the-jedi-smurf 28 minutes ago
by taffy76 32 minutes ago
Why Join | Chess Topics |
Help & Support |
© 2015 Chess.com
• Chess - English
We are working hard to make Chess.com available in over 70 languages. Check back over the year as we develop the technology to add more, and we will try our best to notify you when your language is ready for translating!