Upgrade to Chess.com Premium!

Comments


  • 21 months ago

    Attack198842

    Nice ..i get a sense of uncomfortable to play these positions ...now yea guess wont hve it ...most probably white looses because they simply try to advance creating back ward pawn weakness ...thinks better to play on king side for white .

     

  • 2 years ago

    NimzoRoy

    More great games and another great lecture! Thanks!

    Who was Nimzovitch playing in the first game?

    This opening is not the Bogo-Indian, isn't the Bogo-Indian Defense 1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nf3 Bb4+? The openings here are known as "The Old Indian Defense" (no fianchetto by Black, kind of like a Philidors Defense vs 1.d4)

  • 2 years ago

    67jedichessmaster

    Why is  it saying this video is deleted?

  • 2 years ago

    jocheckoh

    great explanation of the game, keep them coming, very enjoyable to see

  • 2 years ago

    GM dbojkov

    They did what they did and this was great! I just tried to explain a little part of their enormous contribution to the chess world.

  • 2 years ago

    cabrego

    Nice games, who was Nimzo playing against in those games?

  • 2 years ago

    shahzeb__alam

    great video. thanx..

  • 2 years ago

    GM dbojkov

    You are all very welcome. Happy Easter to the Orthodox Christians!

  • 2 years ago

    chessboard3194

    that gm player makes alot of videos

  • 2 years ago

    shady4life

    Great video. thanks

  • 2 years ago

    ealdor

    Many concepts beautifully explained.  Many thanks.

  • 2 years ago

    elindauer

    Great video.  I really struggle in these positions, I learned a lot about black's counterplay against the c & e pawns.  I found the idea of Ne5 and giving white f4 for free to weaken e4 to be particularly insightful.  Thanks!

  • 2 years ago

    _IronButterfly_

    This has got to be one of the best videos for black!   I can't play black very well, but this may help some.  Thank you so much!  

  • 2 years ago

    Mirek71

    very useful for me! 

Back to Top

Post your reply: