Atomic Fog of War is Bad

Sort:
talliholic

I think this mode is kinda bad bcuz you don't really know if you lose or win.

Nf3 from white already threads # but you also don't know if black defends it or if black defends Ne5 but white played Nc3  or white could go for Nf3 and Ne5 but maybe black did d6 and could have won with Ng5 and... in conslusion it's just luck that you think the current position of your oponent correctly.

What do you think?

Radon

Surprised you bother playing Atomic FoG, it is just white wins as there is no blind defence to all the common 3 move mates.

BabYagun

Thank you for your feedback!

If Atomic Fog is bad, we can improve it or remove it. A very simple way to improve it is to change initial setup, for example, place knights to the corners. Or we can mix it with Chess 960, so every game will have a new starting position.

Can you offer a setup where white doesn't have multiple "common 3 move mates"?

LongTermFuture
BabYagun wrote:

Thank you for your feedback!

If Atomic Fog is bad, we can improve it or remove it. A very simple way to improve it is to change initial setup, for example, place knights to the corners. Or we can mix it with Chess 960, so every game will have a new starting position.

Can you offer a setup where white doesn't have multiple "common 3 move mates"?

I'd like to see a mix of regular Fog of War with Chess 960, please.

Azeezah
LongTermFuture wrote:
BabYagun wrote:

Thank you for your feedback!

If Atomic Fog is bad, we can improve it or remove it. A very simple way to improve it is to change initial setup, for example, place knights to the corners. Or we can mix it with Chess 960, so every game will have a new starting position.

Can you offer a setup where white doesn't have multiple "common 3 move mates"?

I'd like to see a mix of regular Fog of War with Chess 960, please.

Ooh that's a good idea.  I second that one.

ChessWinnerShaurya

Great idea