Balance

Sort:
Avatar of omatamix

I think 4 player chess would be more balanced if blue and greens queens and kings were switched.

[StartFen4 "R-0,0,0,0-1,1,1,1-1,1,1,1-0,0,0,0-0-3,yR,yN,yB,yK,yQ,yB,yN,yR,3/3,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,3/14/bR,bP,10,gP,gR/bN,bP,10,gP,gN/bB,bP,10,gP,gB/bQ,bP,10,gP,gK/bK,bP,10,gP,gQ/bB,bP,10,gP,gB/bN,bP,10,gP,gN/bR,bP,10,gP,gR/14/3,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,3/3,rR,rN,rB,rQ,rK,rB,rN,rR,3"]
[Variant "Teams"]
[RuleVariants "EnPassant"]
[CurrentMove "0"]

Avatar of SenSeiShoujin

wow, it's true

Avatar of omatamix
SenSeiShoujin wrote:

wow, it's true

 

It's because the set up has to be the same based on the players perspective for all players to make it balanced.

Avatar of OnlyExecute

yes OK good idea and it maks sense

Avatar of Martin0

The reason why this setup is not used is to avoid the queens and kings to start on the same diagonal.

Avatar of omatamix
Martin0 wrote:

The reason why this setup is not used is to avoid the queens and kings to start on the same diagonal.

 

But all players are equal at start. There has to be a better reason. Also the current setup the queens and kings are on the same diagonal.

Avatar of Martin0

What do you mean equal? All players start with the same points and material regardless of which symmetry is used. In regular chess white starts with his king on the right side, while black starts with his king on the left side.

Avatar of omatamix
Martin0 wrote:

What do you mean equal? All players start with the same points and material regardless of which symmetry is used. In regular chess white starts with his king on the right side, while black starts with his king on the left side.

 

Yes it is equal, the current setup is always restricted for bg. My setup you can do a lot of things that work. I bet you i can win on ry or bg.

Avatar of Martin0

In the current setup all queens start on dark squares, while all kings start on light squares. No king are on the same diagonal as any queen.

Avatar of omatamix
Martin0 wrote:

In the current setup all queens start on dark squares, while all kings start on light squares. No king are on the same diagonal as any queen.

 

But why is that setup better lol.

Avatar of Martin0

Do you only think of things as better or worse? It's different. No matter which symmetry you use, it is roughly equal. The advantage comes from first move advantage, not whether the queen is on the right or left side.

I'm saying that the reason the current setup is used is to avoid the kings and queens to start on the same diagonals. It's awkward if you can't move the queens pawn without getting exposed to checks. And as you might know, checks can be deadly in 4 player chess.

Avatar of omatamix
Martin0 wrote:

Do you only think of things as better or worse? It's different. No matter which symmetry you use, it is roughly equal. The advantage comes from first move advantage, not whether the queen is on the right or left side.

I'm saying that the reason the current setup is used is to avoid the kings and queens to start on the same diagonals. It's awkward if you can't move the queens pawn without getting exposed to checks. And as you might know, checks can be deadly in 4 player chess.

 

But "to avoid the kings and queens to start on the same diagonals." is not a good reason. And yes it is for better if bg has more choices. The same amount of power as ry. I am sorry i am not with until i get a good enough reason.

Avatar of Martin0

You haven't really shown any reason to believe why bg would have more choices with your setup. I have already said the reason why the current setup is used. I could go on and elaborate why you may want to avoid the kings and queens to start on the same diagonals, but the argument remains the same. There are no other reason really. The relative position between kings and queens are the only difference in your position after all.

Avatar of omatamix
Martin0 wrote:

You haven't really shown any reason to believe why bg would have more choices with your setup. I have already said the reason why the current setup is used. I could go on and elaborate why you may want to avoid the kings and queens to start on the same diagonals, but the argument remains the same. There are no other reason really. The relative position between kings and queens are the only difference in your position after all.

 

I want you to elaborate lol.

Avatar of OnlyExecute

it would make fpc harder

Avatar of omatamix
troutforlunch wrote:

it would make fpc harder

 

Exactly with the current setup most moves are forced and expected, my setup you can expect anything. The complexity is what make 4pc so fun.

Avatar of OnlyExecute

when i play teams we just about always wn every other gam

 

Avatar of omatamix
troutforlunch wrote:

when i play teams we just about always wn every other gam

 

 

Yup.

Avatar of selrahc1

its already balanced as it is. the player to your right is just as dangerous to you and sometimes more dangerous than the player to your right. if blue and green kings started on right, it will only make it more unbalanced because queen and king start on same diagonal and red has first move advantage to exploit it. 

Avatar of omatamix
selrahc1 wrote:

its already balanced as it is. the player to your right is just as dangerous to you and sometimes more dangerous than the player to your right. if blue and green kings started on right, it will only make it more unbalanced because queen and king start on same diagonal and red has first move advantage to exploit it. 

 

My suggestion is not unbalanced. The starting position is the same for all players based on their perspective. No matter which symmetry is used it is equal. Only thing is keep it the same piece placement for all players. If you make it different by a little it is considered unbalanced. If you look at regular chess the piece placement is the same based on the players perspective. You can't just make some excuse like king and queens starting on the same diagonal. Also i win plenty with my layout as blue and green.