It is worth the effort to try to look for good strategies for winning at chess. There are a lot of good and bad ones around. A chess strategy worth considering is reading the play philosophy of the opponent instead of focusing on the particular strategy used. After all, it is the man that makes strategies, not the strategies that make the man.
Seeing what strategies opponents use in chess is important but this is just secondary to seeing what kind of chess player the opponent is. Players are more important than strategies. Players will use different strategies but will have the same play philosophy. Play philosophy is the frame of mind or mind attitude a player has, regardless of what strategies the person is using at the moment. It is the mark or manner by which a player prioritizes certain things in the play.
Often, if a player is absorbed with the queen or any particular piece, it will remain the opted piece in any game no matter what strategy is used. If we are fond of the rooks, for instance, we would prefer to use rooks to carry out a forking, pinning, skewering, Zugzwang, or any strategy preferred. We would probably even sacrifice a queen than rooks and use them in checkmates. Hence, we can use different strategies but have the same distinct preferences.
A chess strategy may be lethal with one player but totally trash with another player. A discovered attack strategy may be very effective with a player and a total disaster with another. This is because players have personalities while strategies have none. Thus, when we stubbornly try to fit a strategy step by step to our play style it may just jeopardize our play in the end. We must adjust the strategy to our play, not the other way around.
Thus, when we play, it would help so much not only to beat strategies but the players as well. We need to remember that we're really up against persons or minds, not just formulas for winning. When we see a player strictly playing by the book and not by what should be judged by the mind in a particular context, we easily beat that player. The player is overwhelmed by steps and procedures to perfect a strategy while we deal with what the situation is calling for.
Remember, the game is not a chess strategy against another strategy. It is player versus player with emerging situational strategies. That's the realistic strategy.
It is worth the effort to try to look for good strategies for winning at chess. There are a lot of good and bad ones around. A chess strategy worth considering is reading the play philosophy of the opponent instead of focusing on the particular strategy used. After all, it is the man that makes strategies, not the strategies that make the man.
Seeing what strategies opponents use in chess is important but this is just secondary to seeing what kind of chess player the opponent is. Players are more important than strategies. Players will use different strategies but will have the same play philosophy. Play philosophy is the frame of mind or mind attitude a player has, regardless of what strategies the person is using at the moment. It is the mark or manner by which a player prioritizes certain things in the play.
Often, if a player is absorbed with the queen or any particular piece, it will remain the opted piece in any game no matter what strategy is used. If we are fond of the rooks, for instance, we would prefer to use rooks to carry out a forking, pinning, skewering, Zugzwang, or any strategy preferred. We would probably even sacrifice a queen than rooks and use them in checkmates. Hence, we can use different strategies but have the same distinct preferences.
A chess strategy may be lethal with one player but totally trash with another player. A discovered attack strategy may be very effective with a player and a total disaster with another. This is because players have personalities while strategies have none. Thus, when we stubbornly try to fit a strategy step by step to our play style it may just jeopardize our play in the end. We must adjust the strategy to our play, not the other way around.
Thus, when we play, it would help so much not only to beat strategies but the players as well. We need to remember that we're really up against persons or minds, not just formulas for winning. When we see a player strictly playing by the book and not by what should be judged by the mind in a particular context, we easily beat that player. The player is overwhelmed by steps and procedures to perfect a strategy while we deal with what the situation is calling for.
Remember, the game is not a chess strategy against another strategy. It is player versus player with emerging situational strategies. That's the realistic strategy.
http://chessstratagem.com/