This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant get accepted.
This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant get accepted.
have you heard of giveaway? lol
The concept is cool but yeah like you said draws are quite easy to achieve, it would probably be like tic tac toe except more complicated
This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant and get accepted.
in which case there is the same problem, because it would be very hard and I think impossible to force an opponent to lose the second-to-last piece
This forum thread has been identified by cgabot as a discussion topic.
This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant and get accepted.
in which case there is the same problem, because it would be very hard and I think impossible to force an opponent to lose the second-to-last piece
you don't need bare piece rule... literally just make it play for points
This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant and get accepted.
in which case there is the same problem, because it would be very hard and I think impossible to force an opponent to lose the second-to-last piece
you don't need bare piece rule... literally just make it play for points
Yea is a good idea, but we just have to put 40 points checkmate to prevent one player claim win if he has 20 points more.
I have an idea for a new variant of chess: Kingless Chess. This variant is just like normal chess, with the exception that there are no kings on the board. To win, all of the opponent's pieces must be captured. However, I have noted that many games end in a draw, such as queen and rook versus queen, as the opponent can always evade traps without being captured, since there are no checks in this variant.
I think this is already a thing
This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant and get accepted.
in which case there is the same problem, because it would be very hard and I think impossible to force an opponent to lose the second-to-last piece
you don't need bare piece rule... literally just make it play for points
Yea is a good idea, but we just have to put 40 points checkmate to prevent one player claim win if he has 20 points more.
that doesn't work, you can't checkmate if there's no royal piece lol
This is a very interesting idea!
We just have to fix this problem of draw.
Probably by putting bare piece rule.
I hope that this variant and get accepted.
in which case there is the same problem, because it would be very hard and I think impossible to force an opponent to lose the second-to-last piece
you don't need bare piece rule... literally just make it play for points
Yea is a good idea, but we just have to put 40 points checkmate to prevent one player claim win if he has 20 points more.
that doesn't work, you can't checkmate if there's no royal piece lol
Their point was to make claim win 40 point advantage instead of 20
I have an idea for a new variant of chess: Kingless Chess. This variant is just like normal chess, with the exception that there are no kings on the board. To win, all of the opponent's pieces must be captured. However, I have noted that many games end in a draw, such as queen and rook versus queen, as the opponent can always evade traps without being captured, since there are no checks in this variant.