What is your criticism of the lichess analysis tool?
If you are sub-1500 then all you have to do is learn from your losses, especially as black.
Creating a proper Atomic Study.
Sort:
Oct 9, 2025
0
#3
"Lichess one is fine don't get me wrong, but it wouldn't carry the same reliable strength that having a direct processor would." If I'm running the engine on my hardware then it'll be stronger than a cloud engine. That's my criticism of it.
I'm rated 2178 atomic blitz. So this isn't really a matter of learning from losses.
Howdy! Returning back to Atomic has been a treat for me, and all the while I've been building my own personal study that way I have lines ready for both me and to share with those struggling 1400s that seem to hang the farm in the first 1-3 moves. The better we all understand Atomic the less likely people are to give up on it.
Right now I've been stuck using the lichess web analysis when it comes to putting together my studies, but I've been trying to move it over to En Croissant, the main GUI I've been using for my own studies. Like the 1. a4 / Ware course and 1... a5 which I'll begin building shortly after I finish a4. Though I've struggled to find a good way to focus the engine in on Atomic. Lichess one is fine don't get me wrong, but it wouldn't carry the same reliable strength that having a direct processor would. Do any of you guys have tips or a path you followed how to do this? The tech space isn't my strong suit so any help would be appreciated thank you so much!