CW Live 2023

You have a mistake idea in that players with 2000 ratings cannot be cheaters. But the possibility of being a cheater exists in all rating levels. It is necessary to analyze the types of movements x game time, centipawn, etc.

@Pirx was tireless and @salsaton too.

Last 1|0 MCA of 2023, everyone was going all out

think about htis: if you were the only 2300 in the entire arena (who was playing) and the next highest rated player was a 1700, don't you think you would get a 66+ streak? you are 600 raring points higher rated then the next strongest player. it is like a 1600 playing a 1000.

Yeah, this arena was insane. Gg everyone and see you on blitz arenas (:

Do these accuracies look like that of a cheater to you lol

Example of accuracy with bots:

what is your point here

yeah, 2100 bots still lower than the rating of that player.

There is an expression on my country that is "os entendidos entenderão". The translation is around: "the understanders will understand."

not all, on the screenshots for example you can see Aman, Arjun, Sofia bots

I can murder all the 2500-2600 bots consistently, but I wouldn't do so well against 2300-rated human opponents.

There is no comparison here, and I highly doubt that if they are going to use a bot, they would choose these bozo chess.com bots instead of actual stockfish or something lmao

No offense to @Liz-1, but I can probably go 100/100 against you in 1|0 bullet, and I'm 100 points lower rated than Ethereal. It's not like she did this well against people her level. In fact, it would be more concerning if she is indeed losing more games to 1500s.

Yeah, and it's not like they were unbeatable. If you are talking about Cursed_Nightingale, I even beat them in one game XD

Against me in a online game with 1|0 from Chesscom, anyone can to win (hehe). It is not new because the Chess server to my country is terrible. On Lichess, maybe I could to have a chance. However, the point is not me. 

When I say that someone is using engine, it is not against me, it is against other players and all behaviour around.

I sent a screenshots with an example of bot, because you posted a screenshots saying that the accuracy from "Cursed-Night" was low. You tried to prove with your screenshot that "low accuracy" prove that it is not engine.

Thus, I sent to you an example where machines (bots) can to have low accuracy too.

Of course, a player that uses engine and have "medium accuracy" is a professional cheater (like the players from SK). Unfortunately, it is very common.

The same for @Vombat-11, the second account from a "professional cheater", however on this case he does not use engine but another kind of cheating.

Hehe, good night guys

But the point kinda is you

I'm saying that someone of her skill should have no problems beating people in that arena consistently with no issues, using you only as an example to prove my point. A material proof of that is her accuracy, although by your logic any and all chess players, including you, could be cheating with those bots. For example, take any 400, and I can say they're cheating because "Martin has around the same accuracy as them".

Its kind of disappointing to see the people here, especially you, jumping to conclusions of cheating the moment someone does decently well in an event, be it arenas or daily matches. Should I have to fear for my account being banned the next time I get a lucky streak in some arena, then?

I understand that they could be cheating (And it will always be a possibility), but it should NEVER be the first thing we consider when faced with great performance. Only when you have iron-clad, undisputable evidence of someone violating the fair-play policy should you be jumping to that conclusion, and even then you should not be accusing them publically - just send a report to chess.com or DM a moderator, and don't make a fuss about it in public forums!

This not only applies to Ethereal but to the other guys you accused as well. What if they just got lucky? What if they were just having a good day that day and the others were not? What if they secretly trained 24 hours a day in a bunker for a week straight just to prepare for this arena? The possible explanations that don't involve cheating are literally endless here.

I never say the same here. I just say the name of @Vombat-11, However, it is another history, without engine to win, just the reverse.

You that mentinoned the other names. You that mentioned the name "Cursed_Nightingale" with your screenshots. You expose this player, not me.

I have modes to detected a cheater and I do not say the names. How a cheater is detected? I never will say, because if I say, the cheater will know how to avoid this detectation. (hehe)

???

Wasn't you who said "#1, #2, and #5" in the arena are cheating?