Evidence for creation discussed

Its from a guy whose life has been about gathering evidence, how could be the same?

You've been asked this before but if you think that guy has uncovered something truly original, by all means lay out what that might be?

Frankly, I'll believe it when I see it.

It doesn't have to be original to be cast in a new light.

It could also be said a fresh perspective can give new ways seeing things, because as you point out he isn’t the type of perspective we normally listen to. So why not?

That will never happen when you refuse to look at things you disagree with. Did you ever look up informational instructions in life?

It's usually the less than reliable conclusions that people who lack necessary understanding of the subject-matter reach, that I disagree with. I don't have a problem with the assertion that the Universe is very 'finely tuned' or that a living cell is extremely complex. The problem I have is with the inferences certain unqualified people draw from those facts.

The subect of biological information is on my to-read list I promise you.

Nothing definitive about your standards here, less than reliable conclusions is an assumption on what you consider reliable. Then you turn around and make another non-definitive statement about someone else’s ability to understand. The inferences in play are the things in question, so are you then saying if people do not agree with you they are not reliable? Difficult to get past that if you are only willing to listen to those who agree with you, everyone else simply are not reliable.

https://www.yahoo.com/news/deep-ocean-dark-oxygen-could-155100759.html

Impressive I have never heard of this, I don’t think it solves the problem of where the information that forms and drives all the functions in life, but make more sense than a lighting strike.