i could include an option to jump to a certain move after loading. (isn't that's how it's done above?)
something like [Goto: 23] and have it jump to ply 23 after loading the pgn
would that help?
i could include an option to jump to a certain move after loading. (isn't that's how it's done above?)
something like [Goto: 23] and have it jump to ply 23 after loading the pgn
would that help?
Yeah, you could do that as well I suppose. This is a better example actually:
If you check the PGN, you see a starting FEN and a CurrentPosition FEN.
ok i'll suggest:
[CurrentMove "23"] -> will jump to ply 23
[CurrentMove "23-2-4"] -> will jump to 4th move of 2nd variation of ply 23
and add it to the pgn automatically each time a move is selected.
sound good?
take a look on /4pc-test
[Variant "FFA"]
[CurrentMove "5-2-1"]
1. Ne1-d3 .. b5-d5 .. g13-g11 .. m11-k11
2. Nd3-e5
(2.. Nd3-c5 .. b7-d7 .. f13-f11 )
(2.. Nd3-f4 .. b9-d9 .. Kg14-g13 .. Nn10-l9 )
(2.. Nd3-e1 )
(2.. Nj1-i3 ) .. b11-d11 .. d13-d12 .. k11-j11
3. h2-h4 .. b7-d7 .. f13-f11 .. j11-i11
interesting setup where you have to move a rook first in order to castle
[Variant "FFA"]
[CurrentMove "24"]
[StartFen4 "R-0,0,0,0-1,1,1,1-1,1,1,1-0,0,0,0-0-3,yB,yB,yQ,yN,yN,yR,yK,yR,3/3,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,yP,3/14/bB,bP,10,gP,gR/bB,bP,10,gP,gK/bQ,bP,10,gP,gR/bN,bP,10,gP,gN/bN,bP,10,gP,gN/bR,bP,10,gP,gQ/bK,bP,10,gP,gB/bR,bP,10,gP,gB/14/3,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,rP,3/3,rR,rK,rR,rN,rN,rQ,rB,rB,3"]
[RuleVariants "960"]
1. j2-j3 .. b10-c10 .. e13-e12 .. m5-l5
2. Qi1-k3 .. Qa9-c11 .. Qf14-d12 .. Qn6-l4
3. Nh1-i3 .. Na7-c6 .. Ng14-f12 .. Nn8-l9
4. Ng1-f3 .. Na8-c9 .. Nh14-i12 .. Nn7-l6
5. Ni3-h5 .. Nc9-e8 .. Nf12-g10 .. Nl6-j7
6. i2-i4 .. b9-d9 .. f13-f12 .. m6-l6
Is it possible to turn off automatic scrolling to the end of discussion when someone add new comment? When I try to read comments from the spectators it is annoying that when someone add new comment it always go to the end of conversation, so it would be good to turn it off so I can read it properly. Is there something or not?
thanks
Regarding the new 'create friendly game' feature...
Is there any reason why we cannot have 'days' as an option? I really have problems being able to join games with 'seconds' or even 'minutes' as the only option because I drive ambulance and have to 'down tools' and run off fairly frequently. So while I have a lot of down time, I don't have much dedicated down time... even on my days off I can get suddenly called in.
@VAOhlman, Daily 4PC is possible in theory, but not right now. We will need to save the game after each ply and ignore the fact that players are not online during the game. Also we need to notify players (via chess.com messaging system) about their turn, and so on. Lots of work.
@VAOhlman, Daily 4PC is possible in theory, but not right now. We will need to save the game after each ply and ignore the fact that players are not online during the game. Also we need to notify players (via chess.com messaging system) about their turn, and so on. Lots of work.
Ah, ok. I didn't think about the whole 'players not online' thing.
Do you plan a slower variant? At the moment I have too many time outs due to short interruptions of my connection, which is pity.
the next big update will introduce many different time controls. eta 1-2 months
Like, daily? or just longer live games?
I am not fond of the idea of getting banned for talking about teaming in a free-for-all. To me, it makes no sense. No matter what people will team. You don't have to talk to team there can be a non-verbal team and they won't get chat-banned for it. Technically a chat-ban should only be used for profanity or bullying or scamming. Teaming doesn't fit under any of those. It is a strategy among many that should be allowed to win a game.
Exactly, what @Martin0 said.