Flood Geology Critique by a YEC Flood Geologist

The more significant issue (for the OP) is the YEC flood geologist Ken Coulson's part 2 video

Okay, life is almost back to normal, I've looked at a few of the links, but since it is been a while please give me one to focus on. 

Give me a # of post so I don't screw up and focus on the wrong one.

#1

I'll start on the 2nd

Two completed, again as I have told you I don't follow YEC web sites so I am asking you what you think I'm to make of this?

"I have told you I don't follow YEC web sites..." - do you find their views on scripture too challenging and modern?  😉

I don't look at the past as they do, I've told you over and over processes are the main concern I have. You can have all the time you want to justify that your theories are viable, but it is the processes that supposedly do the work where my concern comes into play. You want to tell me fossils here in that strata means this, fine by me. 

I have written this before rates in the here and now cannot tell us any more than this is the rate in the here and now. Without a sure starting point, we don't know how long something has been occurring or if the rates were constant. It's the problem of checking the speed of a  car we can know what it is now but was it always running at that rate and how long it was on the road don't come from grasping the rate in real-time, you assume much.

This OP is not about that. It's about problems with Flood geology 

Well sounds like it's about the interpretation of geology, the only way there would be a problem as I see it is if someone calls what they think about why things are the way they are, facts.

The OP looks at problems with YEC flood geology. For example, most YECs put the start of the flood at the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary. But as YEC flood geologists like Ken Coulson note, the presence of stromatolites above and below this boundary shows that the Precambrian-Cambrian boundary cannot be the start of the flood.

The fact that all life does not appear in the same rock layer, but specific types of life are confined to specific rock units (*faunal succession*) is one of the most important observational facts about the fossil record. This would seem to permit only three possible explanations for that fact.

I will bow out, even though I believe in young earth it is because I don't see the need for an old one, but I could be wrong there, have at it.

An old earth has nothing to do with it. Doesn't explain problems with flood geology.  But since we're on the subject, you don't seem to know the difference between assumptions and evidence.