He would make Himself known on His terms not ours.

That goes without saying of course but until that happened we wouldn't be able to know.

Jesus Christ the Word made flesh walked the Earth as a man, fully man, and fully God.

And now we're straight to it! The problem with connecting arbitrary straight lines between things is that others can do that just as well - the 'god' of Islam is very different from that of Christianity and it's just as reasonable (or unreasonable?) to draw a straight line from 'creator' to Allah. Why not if we're going to play that game?

In Islam Jesus is revered as a prophet but that's all, remember.

No, the plain truth is that concluding that an unspecified 'creator' was responsible for everythng we see does not make any connection with anything written down in the late Bronze Age or since.

No, Unlike every other religion none of their scared text compared to the Biblical text. The Bible is a complication of 66 books, written in more than one language on three different continents over a span of 1500 years, written by at least 40 different authors, from kings, prophet, apostles, fishermen, Jews and Gentiles. 
Speaking about one God, which can be studied as they refer to one another in a systematic method. The shear amount of manuscripts across time makes it impossible for anyone to alter them without it being easy found out.

Your comparison is without merit.

What is "their scared text" exactly? But to be clear, you're arguing for the supremacy of the Bible over all other religious works?

I'm not sure why the distribution of the Biblical authors around the eastern shore of the Mediterranean should be particularly significant? The Roman Empire encompassed a vast area from Britain in the west across to modern day Syria and down through Judea into Egypt, also three continents but we don't regard that as support for the existence of their gods, do we?

Yes, I am, and the Bible points to God, to Jesus Christ, and to man's fall, so we see our state.

Again, dogmatic assertions and little else. That may be enough for people of faith, it's not enough for those who require a higher standard by which to judge whether something is probably the case.

"spoken into existence"? .... hmm.

creation ex nihilo

You think what occurred instead?

Do you think you base your truth on something other than some fundamental truths?

All belief systems must be founded on certain fundamental assumptions. A fundamental assumption is that we exist as individuals with the ability to think logically but we cannot be absolutely certain of this.

The important think is that assumptions such as gravity behaving the same throughout the Cosmos are logical and reasonable.

One of the fundamentals is our minds can intelligenty rationally discern the universe if our minds are the end product of an unguided process as is the rest of the universe what hope is there for that? A designed universe and a designed mind by the same designer we may grasp it, but like you said with limitations not fully understand.