did you get the bishop from a pawn?
Game review incorrectly identified a bishop as a pawn

no, he's talking about the queen taking on B7, anyway, If the knight where to take you'd just take back with your rook.

No, it wasn't incorrect. It stated that Nxf7 wins a pawn. It doesn't win the bishop because the king would just take back. But after Nxf7, Kxf7, Qxb7, White has indeed won a pawn.

Clock the Show Moves button and it will show you how it wins a pawn. You trade knight for bishop then win the pawn with queen takes pawn on b7.

no, he's talking about the queen taking on B7, anyway, If the knight where to take you'd just take back with your rook.
Yes, but that still does not give a explanation for why it called the bishop a pawn

I don't think its wrong its just saying its the best way to get up a pawn (in material). Click "Show Moves" it shows you the moves to get up a pawn.

Clock the Show Moves button and it will show you how it wins a pawn. You trade knight for bishop then win the pawn with queen takes pawn on b7.
Oh, that makes sense. Thank you!

no, he's talking about the queen taking on B7, anyway, If the knight where to take you'd just take back with your rook.
Yes, but that still does not give a explanation for why it called the bishop a pawn
Its not calling the bishop a pawn, its a certain moveset. It shows the moves on how to be up a pawn of material (1 point)
I was reviewing a recent blitz game when Game Review said that the best move would take a pawn when in reality it took a bishop.
https://www.chess.com/analysis/game/live/73924181753?tab=review