It's not really that practical because 1) the best bot variants has is Futer, which isn't that good, 2) every game has an entirely different gameplay style, so standardised review is difficult to reach, 3) there are too many variants on server, 4) because "it's out of the budget" - CGAs, and 5) because CGAs are too lazy.
How about game review for custom variants?
Sort:
1)I meant a human
2) openings for EACH variant.
4) get someone to do it for free (if they are willing)
5) doesn’t have to be CGA
We just need bot players for variants that work.
oh we already have that.
Jack had a whole documentation on Villagers Chess before he got banned for cheating.
2bHNST wrote:
It's not really that practical because 1) the best bot variants has is Futer, which isn't that good, 2) every game has an entirely different gameplay style, so standardised review is difficult to reach, 3) there are too many variants on server, 4) because "it's out of the budget" - CGAs, and 5) because CGAs are too lazy.
We’re not the ones who develop the server; these are meant for server developers.
2bHNST wrote:
oh we already have that.
Jack had a whole documentation on Villagers Chess before he got banned for cheating.
Who’s Jack?
Someone can play 20+ games (against 10 players, 2 each or 2 players, 10 each) and learn from them, seeing what should (or shouldn’t) be played, who knows? Maybe new openings can be invented (and named) in the variants!!