If the natual world is all there is?

Sort:
TruthMuse
stephen_33 wrote:

This dialogue isn't going anywhere & serves no purpose.

 

I agree with you; your concern is motivational, which you put above facts and truth. What this does is render questions of facts and truth meaningless in the end if someone wasn’t looking at the question with the proper intention in your eyes. We can have high, great, pure motivation, and intentions, and still, screw things up royally! Look at politicians, claim great intentions, and want to be judged by those intentions, not by the results, which can result in poor outcomes! Results, not intentions matter in reality, in science or politics. Our motivation is meaningless accept in doing our work honestly in finding truth, facts, evidence, doing the math are all part of it. If someone is heavily biased and wants to prove a point, and they do, does not null the proof they produced, instead it only showed they were right in the first place!