Information and Evolutionary Mechanisms

Sort:
TruthMuse
tbwp10 wrote:

By disagree then I take it that you think it's unreasonable to infer on the basis of physics.  Got it.

Not at all; I think you are basing your calculations on things that cannot be falsified; therefore, if your premises are wrong, your math could be spot on, but your conclusions will be in error.

tbwp10

And what would those unfalsifiable premises be?

varelse1

Not only can we see 13 billion years into the past, we can watch the Universe evolve, over all those years.

Watch as it began, hot and dense. And then expand, and grow cooler

 Eventually, the Universe gets big enough, gravity starts to lose its hold, and Dark Energy takes over. And the rate of Expansion gradually accelerates.

tbwp10

@varelse1

Yes, and as I noted (in one of my posts above) even Creation Ministries International recommends YECs not use the "light created in transit" argument anymore for the same types of reasons you raise.

TruthMuse
tbwp10 wrote:

And what would those unfalsifiable premises be?

Anything you trust that tells you what occurred millions or billions of years ago.

tbwp10
TruthMuse wrote:
tbwp10 wrote:

And what would those unfalsifiable premises be?

Anything you trust that tells you what occurred millions or billions of years ago.

We're not talking about what happened millions or billions of years ago but evidence that the universe is that old.  You have yet to give any convincing reason as to why it's unreasonable to infer on the basis of physics that light from a light source one million light years away takes one million light years to reach us.

TruthMuse

Not what happened millions or billions of years ago, but that is that old. That is that old is something that happened millions or billions of years ago. 

tbwp10

As I've said you still have yet to give any convincing reason as to why it's unreasonable to infer on the basis of physics that light from a light source one million light years away takes one million light years to reach us